General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Anonymous did not stop Rove from stealing the election. [View all]Ford_Prefect
(8,687 posts)to apprehend them? Do you prefer that they did not act at all? If they did act do you approve?
If they have evidence to provide whom do you suggest should present it?
My opinion was and is that it is possible they did not act. It could also be that ROVE had no Hail Mary pass planned and so nothing happened at all. I also said I thought it was unlikely to be the case that either of those conditions were true.
I suppose it is possible that Rove had something in place which failed for other reasons, though to me it seems unlikely. Please note that this remark is only an opinion.
I am not defending lawless acts by anyone and have not. I have speculated that Anonymous are unlikely to act against their interests. It is not something they seem to have done up to now. I have not said it was legal or OK for them to withhold evidence.
However, If we have benefited from their actions is that wrong?