General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Wasn't sure whether to believe the Anonymous/Rove story,until the reaction telling us to shut up @it [View all]sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)in 2000 and 2004 also. That didn't stop them from stealing elections did it? Or are you a supporter of the theory that Bush was a duly and rightfully elected President of the United States both times?
For some people the proportion of their income they donated to Democrats over the past decade probably exceeds your donation proportionately. And may even have strained their finances which most likely was not the case for those who can afford to make big donations.
So it's even more of an issue for those who made those sacrifices, not at beautiful private fundraisers (yes I've been there, it's very enjoyable) but out on the streets pounding the pavement, knocking on doors, in the rain, in the snow and in intense heat and buying less for their children in order to do so.
I fail to see your point, frankly unless you are equating the amount of money you can afford to give to a campaign to refusing to believe that you waste that money when elections are stolen.
I view it proportionately, in the biblical 'widow's mite' sense of the value of what people contribute.
But no matter what they give, how does that in any way relate to the issue of Election Fraud, unless you do not believe it exists?