Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Ocelot II

(130,696 posts)

6. That's my guess as well.

Reply to bigtree (Reply #4)

Tue Feb 6, 2024, 02:05 PM

Feb 2024

The basic immunity issues are pretty straightforward but the question of whether the decision was immediately appealable, giving the court jurisdiction, was more complicated and they had to be sure they nailed it down.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

scipan

6 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Appeals Court's Trump immunity decision contains a colorful, devastating summary of charges against the appellant [View all] bigtree Feb 2024 OP

I see now why it took longer than expected. Ocelot II Feb 2024 #1

I'd guess the jusrisdiction section took the most time bigtree Feb 2024 #4

That's my guess as well. Ocelot II Feb 2024 #6

Gratifying, cilla4progress Feb 2024 #2

That was very well written Takket Feb 2024 #3

There it is, consistent with 14A Sec 3 "At this stage of the prosecution, we assume that the allegations set forth ..." bucolic_frolic Feb 2024 #5