Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Ray Bruns

(6,370 posts)
21. I'm sure Alito and Uncle Ruckus will reference some 15th century scholars on why trump should stay on the ballot
Thu Feb 8, 2024, 11:38 AM
Feb 2024

Recommendations

3 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

They never has a problem montanacowboy Feb 2024 #1
My prediction is they will allow this but not the immunity jimfields33 Feb 2024 #5
That's funny because I remember that John Roberts wasn't on the court in 2000 AZSkiffyGeek Feb 2024 #7
I believe William Rehnquist was Chief Justice. Emile Feb 2024 #8
True and the deciding vote on that one was cast by Ms Moderate - Sandra Day O'Connor SouthernDem4ever Feb 2024 #9
No, but his work for W Bush to stop the FL recount is possibly (likely) what got him the job later. Attilatheblond Feb 2024 #18
roberts was a lawyer that helped install bush in the White House Marthe48 Feb 2024 #19
He did work for Bush dpibel Feb 2024 #42
I can assume how Thomas and Alito will rule. ProudMNDemocrat Feb 2024 #2
I'm sure Alito and Uncle Ruckus will reference some 15th century scholars on why trump should stay on the ballot Ray Bruns Feb 2024 #21
I somehow doubt that legitimacy will now be a concern to them. cloudbase Feb 2024 #3
What I was going to post Johnny2X2X Feb 2024 #12
Leader of the insurrection.................................. Lovie777 Feb 2024 #4
My bet ... SomewhereInTheMiddle Feb 2024 #6
I agree. The SC will probably rule that Trump has to be convicted before he can be removed from the ballot. patphil Feb 2024 #10
Precedent was set sanatanadharma Feb 2024 #11
My thought there ... SomewhereInTheMiddle Feb 2024 #15
I don't think that has ever been hashed out by the Supreme Court Zeitghost Feb 2024 #41
I think they are going to say that Jan 6th was more like a riot than an insurrection Buckeyeblue Feb 2024 #13
Message auto-removed Name removed Feb 2024 #14
Well argued ... SomewhereInTheMiddle Feb 2024 #16
I have no faith in this SCOTUS. TSExile Feb 2024 #17
Trump served 2 terms Puppyjive Feb 2024 #20
...and... Mr.Bee Feb 2024 #26
Because of 14A, there must be some method of disqualification because bucolic_frolic Feb 2024 #22
Another writer pointed out ... AncientOfDays Feb 2024 #23
He gave aid and comfort. Emile Feb 2024 #25
STILL does by 'promising' PARDONS if E-C elected. Justice matters. Feb 2024 #43
This message was self-deleted by its author a kennedy Feb 2024 #24
Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan. nt Carlitos Brigante Feb 2024 #28
Damn........sorry, you're right an I'm an idiot. a kennedy Feb 2024 #35
It happens. "PTSD" of the last few years and all that. nt Carlitos Brigante Feb 2024 #37
His lawyer just argued.... getagrip_already Feb 2024 #27
I have this in but not listening underpants Feb 2024 #29
Nope..... getagrip_already Feb 2024 #31
Yep a prez can just declare themself Dr. Shepper Feb 2024 #32
Just his lawyers opinion... getagrip_already Feb 2024 #34
need to be convicted of insurrection to be removed Mr.Bee Feb 2024 #36
Since when orangecrush Feb 2024 #30
So they'll use illegitimate ones. malthaussen Feb 2024 #33
Totally insane that we can't get any real change done in this country. Initech Feb 2024 #38
He gave the rich more money redqueen Feb 2024 #39
of course they do Zincwarrior Feb 2024 #40
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»SCOTUS has 'no legitimate...»Reply #21