Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: ***SCOTUS hearing Colorado case, [View all]edhopper
(37,370 posts)17. Thanks
Yes, considering it was used against so many in the Confederacy, original intent is obvious.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
62 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
THomas asks him if there is any history of this happening. Duh. Dumb question.
lindysalsagal
Feb 2024
#22
Roberts trying to claim no standing for states to stop national candidates. He's already decided.
lindysalsagal
Feb 2024
#24
If states can't stop candidates, who can? How else can this amendment be enacted?
lindysalsagal
Feb 2024
#41
Interesting, isn't it, we and the SC 'only now' recognizing 'difficulty' of federalism,
elleng
Feb 2024
#38