Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

edhopper

(37,370 posts)
17. Thanks
Thu Feb 8, 2024, 11:42 AM
Feb 2024

Yes, considering it was used against so many in the Confederacy, original intent is obvious.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

cbs live link on youtube orleans Feb 2024 #1
Thank you! StarryNite Feb 2024 #15
Thomas who never talks, first out of the gate Sympthsical Feb 2024 #2
Right! elleng Feb 2024 #4
With a leading question C_U_L8R Feb 2024 #5
I guess he's getting nervous. People are onto him Walleye Feb 2024 #7
Thomas asks first question! elleng Feb 2024 #3
What does that mean? edhopper Feb 2024 #10
It means does there need to be a conviction or act of congress getagrip_already Feb 2024 #16
Thanks edhopper Feb 2024 #17
Yes, it is. sinkingfeeling Feb 2024 #14
I am watching on MSNBC LetMyPeopleVote Feb 2024 #6
I am watching it on MSNBC, too. n/t ChazII Feb 2024 #8
i THINK that justice kagan is eating Mitchell alive riversedge Feb 2024 #9
I can hear the flop sweat on the Trump attorney C_U_L8R Feb 2024 #11
Barrett's always an interesting listen Sympthsical Feb 2024 #12
Why is this guy babbling about term limits? TSExile Feb 2024 #13
LOL, Justice Jackson Sympthsical Feb 2024 #18
Jason Murray, against tfg, is up now. Sounds strong. lindysalsagal Feb 2024 #19
THomas asks him if there is any history of this happening. Duh. Dumb question. lindysalsagal Feb 2024 #22
Murray is counsel for Colorado. elleng Feb 2024 #23
Jason Murry, calling for states rights. joshcryer Feb 2024 #20
Thomas "states can disqualify" but how: joshcryer Feb 2024 #21
Roberts trying to claim no standing for states to stop national candidates. He's already decided. lindysalsagal Feb 2024 #24
Most justices have "already decided" before the oral argument. onenote Feb 2024 #25
If states can't stop candidates, who can? How else can this amendment be enacted? lindysalsagal Feb 2024 #41
Yeah, not looking too good. Hope I'm wrong. Chakaconcarne Feb 2024 #26
Agreed. lindysalsagal Feb 2024 #28
Murray is having a rough go of it. cloudbase Feb 2024 #31
Gorsuch is wrecking him Sympthsical Feb 2024 #37
I've never thought he would be kicked off that or any ballot underpants Feb 2024 #35
Interesting, isn't it, we and the SC 'only now' recognizing 'difficulty' of federalism, elleng Feb 2024 #38
I do have to say - wasn't the 14th Amendment an act of Congress? underpants Feb 2024 #49
I think this will be five four NoRethugFriends Feb 2024 #27
Can somebody bravely say "Former President Trump"? GreenWave Feb 2024 #29
How about citizen trump JohnSJ Feb 2024 #30
Gorsuch has a voice you'd expect to hear out of a serial killer. Scrivener7 Feb 2024 #32
Colorado Ballot SC hearing lindalou65 Feb 2024 #33
Murray not looking good, gab13by13 Feb 2024 #34
I am betting they won't uphold Colorado. Hope I'm wrong. Scrivener7 Feb 2024 #36
Alito's getting to the heart of the problem Sympthsical Feb 2024 #39
Right, effect of federalism! elleng Feb 2024 #40
That's exactly why SCOTUS exists. To resolve those differences of opinion. Takket Feb 2024 #45
Kagan is being highly skeptical Sympthsical Feb 2024 #42
Yeah this is getting shot down. Murray is getting hammered by everyone. Takket Feb 2024 #43
Maybe they're not super on board with federalism?! elleng Feb 2024 #44
A SC decision seeking uniformity is federalism, though Sympthsical Feb 2024 #46
Right, SCOTUS is stuck with it! elleng Feb 2024 #48
Yea, when she asked why Colorado can chose the candidate for all other states... SKKY Feb 2024 #47
When Justice Jackson is coming for you . . . Sympthsical Feb 2024 #50
Murray is trying to tread water, cloudbase Feb 2024 #51
How can Jackson be asking why President is not included? Takket Feb 2024 #52
I thought his answer was good: They had to enumerate the non-office holders, but the President was Scrivener7 Feb 2024 #55
Murray answered dweller Feb 2024 #56
Right. elleng Feb 2024 #59
Shannon Stvenson up joshcryer Feb 2024 #53
Colorado Solicitor General. elleng Feb 2024 #54
Sorry I gotta go, for Med appt! elleng Feb 2024 #57
Shannon Stevenson, Colorado solicitor general, doing a good job. lindysalsagal Feb 2024 #58
She is doing a really good job. Takket Feb 2024 #60
Mitchell so full of shit. joshcryer Feb 2024 #61
This message was self-deleted by its author Fla Dem Feb 2024 #62
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»***SCOTUS hearing Colorad...»Reply #17