Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

Omaha Steve

(109,388 posts)
Sat Feb 10, 2024, 04:31 PM Feb 2024

'Win-win': Bill to eliminate taxes on Social Security benefits reintroduced [View all]



https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/retirement/win-win-bill-to-eliminate-taxes-on-social-security-benefits-reintroduced-it-would-also-extend-the-program-s-shelf-life-by-20-years-here-s-what-you-need-to-know/ar-BB1hUXS9

Story by Serah Louis • 3d

A recently reintroduced bill in the U.S. House could scrap federal taxes on Social Security benefits starting in 2025, putting more money back into the pockets of retirees.

On Jan. 25, Rep. Angie Craig, D-Minn., reintroduced legislation, dubbed the “You Earned It, You Keep It Act,” that would repeal the taxation of Social Security benefits, while also extending the program's solvency by 20 years.

“This bill is a win-win — it's a tax cut for seniors and a way to ensure more Americans can depend on the Social Security benefits they’ve earned,” Craig said in a press release.

Here’s how the bill would work.

How it will be paid for
Folks with a combined income — which includes your adjusted gross income, plus nontaxable interest, plus half of your Social Security benefits — of $25,000 or more (and couples filing jointly with a combined income of $32,000 or more) currently pay taxes on at least 50% of their benefits.

According to the Social Security Administration, about 40% of people who receive Social Security benefits end up paying taxes on them each year. This is a major source of revenue for the Social Security Old-Age and Survivors Insurance Trust Fund.

FULL story at link above.

Because of this story, I gave $5 to Rep. Angie Craig's ActBlue page: https://secure.actblue.com/donate/angie-craig-2?refcode=directory
71 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Fixing another Reagan disaster Charging Triceratops Feb 2024 #1
It was a bipartisan hit job. Voltaire2 Feb 2024 #44
Yep, everything Reagan signed into law had to pass the House first MichMan Feb 2024 #56
Anything that reverses something Reagan is good for America. calimary Feb 2024 #55
Please let this happen jimfields33 Feb 2024 #2
Get it early if you can. My oldest friend just died at age 60 of liver cancer, so no SSA ever after paying ArkansasDemocrat1 Feb 2024 #14
I'm sorry to hear that. jimfields33 Feb 2024 #18
The annual COLAs are in normal times failing to keep up with actual inflation ArkansasDemocrat1 Feb 2024 #23
I can't even grieve yet ArkansasDemocrat1 Feb 2024 #62
At Least Here In Illinois, We Don't Pay State Income Tax... ProfessorGAC Feb 2024 #50
Same in PA Freddie Feb 2024 #51
No state income tax on IRA or 401k withdrawals either? MichMan Feb 2024 #57
Correct ProfessorGAC Feb 2024 #59
Another Reagan-era legacy that needs to die... Wounded Bear Feb 2024 #3
"a major source of revenue for the Social Security Old-Age and Survivors Insurance Trust Fund." bucolic_frolic Feb 2024 #4
Raising the cap Omaha Steve Feb 2024 #5
Once upon a time, I had a streak of years where i 'paid out' on SS payments EYESORE 9001 Feb 2024 #6
I don't see how Biden signs that unless the top limit is $400,000 Shermann Feb 2024 #11
I'm a payroll admin Freddie Feb 2024 #52
I had to read that a couple times before I figured out it must mean the cap dflprincess Feb 2024 #27
If you work like I do PLUS receive SSI it's clobbering time. GreenWave Feb 2024 #7
Until I read your post I was feeling sorry for myself after doing my taxes this afternoon. dflprincess Feb 2024 #26
Payroll taxes are estimates and assume it is your only income Shermann Feb 2024 #41
If it's a win win for the "average Joe retiree" B.See Feb 2024 #8
I can hear the Republicans Conjuay Feb 2024 #9
Let them ArkansasDemocrat1 Feb 2024 #15
Those of us who have only SS to live on don't pay tax Kaleva Feb 2024 #10
Makes a difference for some couples, Pinback Feb 2024 #24
From my perspective, they are well off Kaleva Feb 2024 #46
But this would not hurt you TxGuitar Feb 2024 #48
Perhaps a better idea would be to couple a tax credit for those without other income with a tax cut for those barbaraann Feb 2024 #54
I'm not begrudging it but I won't support it either Kaleva Feb 2024 #60
You can be taxed on only SS 'income'. Voltaire2 Feb 2024 #49
From the SSA Kaleva Feb 2024 #61
From the maths: Voltaire2 Feb 2024 #63
That is incorrect the tax is not 50% it starts doc03 Feb 2024 #67
Correct. It starts at 50%. With only SS benefits you don't get to 85%. Voltaire2 Feb 2024 #69
wasnt it rr also who added co pays and deductables on top of the monies we already paid 4? AllaN01Bear Feb 2024 #12
No. Presidents do not pass legislation. The 'Reagan' SS changes were passed by a Democratic kelly1mm Feb 2024 #19
During the Reagan Administration a tax of up to 50% doc03 Feb 2024 #30
Yes, I know. Both passed by Democratically controlled congresses. Neither Regan nor Clinton 'raised' anything. Only kelly1mm Feb 2024 #31
Check my post again I added some information on edit. nt doc03 Feb 2024 #32
Again, neither the Reagan nor the Clinton administration raised taxes paid on SS. The Democratic kelly1mm Feb 2024 #33
What is your problem I said the Reagan and doc03 Feb 2024 #35
Because there is a difference between what happens in the administration of X president kelly1mm Feb 2024 #37
Both Presidents signed the Legislation... Happy Hoosier Feb 2024 #39
They would have been bystanders had the Democratically controlled congress not have acted. nt kelly1mm Feb 2024 #40
I don't know what you are trying to argue about, I said during the Reagan and Clinton doc03 Feb 2024 #42
The term administration refers to the executive branch MichMan Feb 2024 #65
First of all my post was not in reply to you. doc03 Feb 2024 #66
Of course repugs will line up behind this tax cut JoseBalow Feb 2024 #13
This would be fantastic. It is a huge injustice & slap in the face to retirees. We paid for it thru a TAX... Hekate Feb 2024 #16
The tax on seniors started by St .Reagan. Liberal In Texas Feb 2024 #17
Last I checked the Democrats were in charge of the House the entirety of Reagan's administration. kelly1mm Feb 2024 #20
Good question sammythecat Feb 2024 #21
I'll tell you the argument I heard... haele Feb 2024 #22
So you are saying the Democratic congress fell for that? nt kelly1mm Feb 2024 #29
Everyone was falling for that, along with getting rid of pork barrel spending. haele Feb 2024 #36
The tax revenue from the ss income penalty goes into general revenue Voltaire2 Feb 2024 #45
It was bipartisan. But on the Social Security website... Liberal In Texas Feb 2024 #25
Why has this evolved into a blame game with doc03 Feb 2024 #71
That would save me a couple thousand dollars, I pay the full amount doc03 Feb 2024 #28
Us too TxGuitar Feb 2024 #53
Damn, I do so wish that would pass. Ferrets are Cool Feb 2024 #34
Would have helped me over years, but don't see it happening. Would love to be wrong. Silent Type Feb 2024 #38
The SS tax is a kludge Shermann Feb 2024 #43
It should be eliminated. Voltaire2 Feb 2024 #47
If it gives Biden a win, they'll tank it. spanone Feb 2024 #58
Kudos to Angie Craig maccafan Feb 2024 #64
Probably won't go anywhere because Emile Feb 2024 #68
Angie know this is symbolism. brooklynite Feb 2024 #70
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»'Win-win': Bill to elimin...