Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: John Roberts demands swift response from Jack Smith to Trump's immunity claim [View all]Fiendish Thingy
(23,397 posts)36. The only remotely unusual thing in his appeal is request for stay for en banc hearing
Trump wants to be able to delay as much as possible, including not skipping the en banc step, however, the lower court only allowed their stay to remain in force if Trump went directly to SCOTUS.
Trump wants SCOTUS to reverse that, which would, at most, get him another 4-6 weeks, tops.
Otherwise, everything is unfolding according to standard procedure.
Nothing to panic about, nor spurt in unfocused, blind outrage.
If anything, we should be stocking up on popcorn, and resting our voices so that we can cheer loudly when the next round of Trumps losing inevitably happens.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
44 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
John Roberts demands swift response from Jack Smith to Trump's immunity claim [View all]
Goodheart
Feb 2024
OP
The only remotely unusual thing in his appeal is request for stay for en banc hearing
Fiendish Thingy
Feb 2024
#36
Wouldn't it be nice if reporters and media commentators knew something about the legal process
Ocelot II
Feb 2024
#13
I suspect Jack Smith had his response ready before it was appealed to the SC. That b,eing said
JohnSJ
Feb 2024
#4
I am just not optimistic with this Supreme Court, and after what happened with Dobbs, and what
JohnSJ
Feb 2024
#15
I agree they won't rule that he has immunity, but I am not sure if the ruling will be delayed until
JohnSJ
Feb 2024
#21
Trump hasn't filed his appeal yet. He's only asked for a stay of the Court of Appeals decision
onenote
Feb 2024
#23
I agree on the outcome, I just don't think they will rush the review, and most likely the events involving his
JohnSJ
Feb 2024
#29
Roberts is nothing but a right wing lackey, pretending -sometimes - to be independent in thought.
lark
Feb 2024
#5
He demands this because why? Does he think Smith is going to sit on his thumbs?
Scrivener7
Feb 2024
#12
For the umpteenth time, there is no "demand". There is a deadline. Smith can file before the deadline. He can choose not
onenote
Feb 2024
#25
Robert's legacy is shit, and I hope that all these misdeeds are rehashed at his
Baitball Blogger
Feb 2024
#19
How is setting a deadline -- shorter than required -- for Smith to respond a "misdeed"?
onenote
Feb 2024
#26
Standard operating procedure for RawStory, which really should be called WrongStory
onenote
Feb 2024
#35