General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Justice for JFK [View all]sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)And like so many others who read the report, several years ago at this point, it raised even more questions.
You should not make assumptions about people you do not know, or make bets so cavalierly. It calls into question how you approach the gathering of facts. Eg, you jumped to a conclusion over something that is fairly trivial and not really all that important. My impression is that if someone is willing to jump to conclusions so quickly about something so relatively innocuous, because it would back their preconceived theories, then it is reasonable to assume they make a habit of doing so.
The correct way to approach the gathering of information, to ensure more accuracy, would be to start by asking a question 'have you ever the read the WCR'?