General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Justice for JFK [View all]sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)way longer than that report. It was very readable, so I don't get your insinuation.
Sounds like you may be projecting a little here. Haven't you ever read a book with more than 200 pages?
No need to repeat what I clearly stated, but I will just to be clear, no, the evidence is not sufficient for me.
I don't 'think' anything, nor have I said that. I have no idea if they 'were hiding something' or not. There are many reasons why so many people find that report to be lacking. It could be eg, that the conclusions were based on an incompetent investigation.
Why jump to a conclusion that was NOT in evidence from my posts. Speaking of CTs. A third person assuming they have mind-reading abilities. Shouldn't such speculation about what is in the minds of others be confined to the CS forum?