General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Justice for JFK [View all]sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)read the report it was not difficult to respond to that question. You asked, I answered. He took no notes according to the WCR.
Edited to add for those who may not click your link. There is NOTHING there that contradicts what I said. No notes from the main interrogator. A few scribbled notes that are barely legible, presumably from other law enforcement who were there. How pathetic that is, so little professioinalism, so little interest in recording one of the most important interviews of THEIR careers and maybe in history.
Although it does prove that they DID have paper and pencils in 1963 after all contrary to what your friend was trying to claim. Too bad they didn't use them.
So what was the point of that link? In fact, had you been able to produce notes from him, which you didn't, that would have meant the WCR had lied, wouldn't it?
Or maybe you never read the report?