General Discussion

LeftInTX

(34,545 posts)

30. You're a fast reader! I'm in your shoes.

Mon Feb 19, 2024, 12:07 PM

Feb 2024

All I know is that the affair should have been an issue that could have been presented in an objective manner. We do have work place rules and if the affair violated a workplace rule, it violated a workplace rule. End of story. People have sex.

The whole hearing should have taken a day. Can't believe it's still going on???

If they are trying to be salacious or try to make it "over the top", sensational, sex driven, tabloid fodder etc, shame on them.

It's all about Trump and his defense team, which has millions. They are trying to discredit the prosecution.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Think. Again.

63 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

I would like to remind us older folk and tell the younger folk [View all] PCIntern Feb 2024 OP

When pukes say look over here, look over there. pwb Feb 2024 #1

Great perspective. Basic LA Feb 2024 #2

OK. So now MOMFUDSKI Feb 2024 #3

She didn't say stuff like that often PCIntern Feb 2024 #9

My wife said something similar regarding terrorists Danascot Feb 2024 #61

You're a lucky man! PCIntern Feb 2024 #62

But I'm not a terrorist Danascot Feb 2024 #63

I'm a little surprised claudette Feb 2024 #4

I agree but PCIntern Feb 2024 #6

. . . and concupiscence concupisces! PTL_Mancuso Feb 2024 #27

I have read that two other candidates turned the position down. FalloutShelter Feb 2024 #8

Wade was third True Blue American Feb 2024 #55

Considering her affair has nothing to do with the case... Think. Again. Feb 2024 #10

If that were claudette Feb 2024 #40

I think that's the question that everyone is asking. Think. Again. Feb 2024 #44

Because venial peopl such as Republicans and Trump* lawyers soldierant Feb 2024 #49

So what? paleotn Feb 2024 #22

No. Of course not claudette Feb 2024 #39

All the lawyers in the Georgia bar have replied, if questioned, thatin Georgia it isn't a violation. soldierant Feb 2024 #50

Wonder if Willis considered how her bowel movements would be perceived. Hermit-The-Prog Feb 2024 #23

Certainly not the same thing claudette Feb 2024 #41

Perhaps a reporter should investigate to confirm no one else was on the toilet. Hermit-The-Prog Feb 2024 #45

Except claudette Feb 2024 #47

Is there evidence of sexual harassment? Hermit-The-Prog Feb 2024 #48

I had forgotten that about Clark and Darden. FalloutShelter Feb 2024 #5

Your mother was right, Goddessartist Feb 2024 #7

I'd like to remind EVERYONE that if the lead prosecutor in GA were a white MALE (or probably even hlthe2b Feb 2024 #11

Absolutely. PCIntern Feb 2024 #12

I guess I'm not quite understanding tavernier Feb 2024 #13

I understand... PCIntern Feb 2024 #15

Ok, just read a synopsis and am caught up. tavernier Feb 2024 #19

Hope so too!!! PCIntern Feb 2024 #20

You're a fast reader! I'm in your shoes. LeftInTX Feb 2024 #30

I opened the most recent press link tavernier Feb 2024 #38

u forgot about the pool boy. mopinko Feb 2024 #14

OMG LOL BumRushDaShow Feb 2024 #21

Oh jeez...Forgot about him and I forgot his name. Wasn't he the "uncooperative witness"? LeftInTX Feb 2024 #24

Kato Kaelin BumRushDaShow Feb 2024 #28

lol. i meant falwell's pool boy, but... mopinko Feb 2024 #33

Ha ha BumRushDaShow Feb 2024 #36

Fani Willis wins the day with her quote: BarbD Feb 2024 #16

And that mountain grammy Feb 2024 #17

Solid proof, again, that one should always listen to their mother. jaxexpat Feb 2024 #18

I know the OJ case happened in 1995 or so. LeftInTX Feb 2024 #25

Right, and the outcome of the trial was a verdict of not guilty for the defendant. Barry Markson Feb 2024 #26

No... PCIntern Feb 2024 #32

Thank you for stating it so well wendyb-NC Feb 2024 #29

It's the never ending story. WinstonSmith4740 Feb 2024 #31

KnR Hekate Feb 2024 #34

Message auto-removed Name removed Feb 2024 #35

No argument there PCIntern Feb 2024 #37

I think MorbidButterflyTat Feb 2024 #42

Have any of those sanctimonious lawyers bothered to ask Chump FakeNoose Feb 2024 #43

At worse - this is a "code of conduct" issue, and I am not really sure that it is. But I would like to point out PaulRevere08 Feb 2024 #46

Apparently, in Georgia, if both spouses are lawyers they can represent opposing sides in a trial. Vinca Feb 2024 #51

Well, Clark and Darden lost a "slam dunk prosecution." Just saying. Silent Type Feb 2024 #52

Causal fallacy much? dpibel Feb 2024 #57

Nope. And I don't read by pointing at -- and mouthing -- each word. Silent Type Feb 2024 #58

So sad dpibel Feb 2024 #60

Home run orangecrush Feb 2024 #53

And Geraldo. Had an affair with Denise True Blue American Feb 2024 #54

Recommended. H2O Man Feb 2024 #56

Lol at your Mom's Wisdom. Cha Feb 2024 #59