General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Did Anonymous set up a firewall that prevented Rove from stealing the election? [View all]Zorra
(27,670 posts)I would think Anonymous knows enough about "the authorities" to not take such a huge risk.
But admittedly, I'm laughably technically challenged so I don't know anything about the magical mystical cyber whatevers that can be used by Anonymous hackers to deliver evidence to "the authorities" without any risk to anyone/everyone who acted as Anonymous.
It appears that publicly stating all over the internet, "Hey, guess what, officer? We have been watching this dude, and he is going to hack the Ohio election" or "Hey, bro ~ check it! We hacked out Rove's drones during the election!
This what we did and how we did it." Does not warrant an investigation.
I guess I'm still really very disappointed and disillusioned that nothing at all was done about the elections of 2000 and 2004 being stolen, about Bush and Cheney not being prosecuted for war crimes, because no banksters were prosecuted for destroying the economy, etc. Maybe some people are immune to investigation, no matter what they do. Who knows, things like this don't seem to add up to truth, justice, and the American Way.
So I personally don't have much faith in "the authorities" to always do the right thing these days. Heck, someone could even wind up self-imprisoned in an Ecuadoran Embassy somewhere for getting caught exposing official and corporate corruption nowadays.
Should we, can we, trust "the authorities" to always do the right thing...


...or is that idea
just another message of dis illusion?

