Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

PSPS

(13,798 posts)

11. Read up on why NATO was created after the war. It was to avoid just what we're witnessing now.

Reply to WarGamer (Reply #10)

Tue Feb 27, 2024, 02:12 AM

Feb 2024

The US doesn't pick up anywhere near "most" of NATO's budget. In fact, the US's contribution is 16% (the same as Germany.) The UK and France come next at 11% and 10%. NATO spending is money well spent and has served its purpose quite well.

If Russia gains Ukraine, it will keep going. Putin said so himself. That's why NATO exists.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

37 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Slovak PM says EU, NATO members weighing sending troops to Ukraine [View all] Quixote1818 Feb 2024 OP

This message was self-deleted by its author WarGamer Feb 2024 #1

So..what to do..shiver in fear about the "what if" or Deuxcents Feb 2024 #2

If it's AFU soldiers... give them what they need. WarGamer Feb 2024 #3

If that had been the attitude 80 years ago, we'd all be speaking German now. PSPS Feb 2024 #9

There was no NATO in WW2... WarGamer Feb 2024 #10

Read up on why NATO was created after the war. It was to avoid just what we're witnessing now. PSPS Feb 2024 #11

This message was self-deleted by its author WarGamer Feb 2024 #13

I don't know if I have ever seen you post a source for all the conservative leaning stats BootinUp Feb 2024 #14

I call it factual. WarGamer Feb 2024 #15

The problem is you are characterizing BootinUp Feb 2024 #16

I think I'd characterize it as... WarGamer Feb 2024 #17

So what u are saying is you want to slash BootinUp Feb 2024 #19

But Putin has global ambitions NickB79 Feb 2024 #26

It's expensive to be the hegemon Dave says Feb 2024 #31

Yeah...paying NATO dues and the amount of military expenditures are two different things. BlueGrimmy Feb 2024 #21

Ukraine is part of and critical to the future Europe, not to China and N. Korea. brush Feb 2024 #29

Yeah, that's not a wise position, IMO. Happy Hoosier Feb 2024 #20

We've given an awful lot..... Red Mountain Feb 2024 #25

The good thng is all the US weapons are made here...jobs,jobs, jobs. brush Feb 2024 #34

China wouldn't waste their resources and I doubt North Korea has many to send ColinC Feb 2024 #4

This message was self-deleted by its author WarGamer Feb 2024 #6

What does China have to gain? Happy Hoosier Feb 2024 #22

Because the threat itself probably stops it from ever happening... WarGamer Feb 2024 #23

Foreign fighters already in Russia cbabe Feb 2024 #5

that's correct... WarGamer Feb 2024 #7

Fun thought for a game Red Mountain Feb 2024 #28

It is certainly not a silly thought. Irish_Dem Feb 2024 #30

China can't get to Ukraine Red Mountain Feb 2024 #32

I am speechless at your response. Irish_Dem Feb 2024 #33

Doubtful..... Red Mountain Feb 2024 #24

They will still need artillery. I think this is just talk though. nt BootinUp Feb 2024 #8

This is likely angrychair Feb 2024 #12

Slovak PM talking out his ass: maxsolomon Feb 2024 #18

NATO may have no choice if the US drops the ball on funding. Irish_Dem Feb 2024 #27

It won't be NATO, but a possibe coalition of European nations as Ukraine is not... brush Feb 2024 #35

Yes of course, the US is seen as unreliable and untrustworthy. Irish_Dem Feb 2024 #37

Well, it is interesting. EndlessWire Feb 2024 #36