General Discussion

Ms. Toad

(38,659 posts)

93. There was a lot of talk in the last hearing

Tue Feb 27, 2024, 05:27 PM

Feb 2024

about how much money the state was paying Wade, and he kept responding that the money came to the firm and was split. They weren't specific this time about what they were talking about.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

106 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Fani Willis hearing live [View all] Beachnutt Feb 2024 OP

Message auto-removed Name removed Feb 2024 #1

This message was self-deleted by its author Beachnutt Feb 2024 #2

"I do not have knowledge of it starting, or when it started," Terrence Bradley said Tuesday" TwilightZone Feb 2024 #3

Woof Sympthsical Feb 2024 #4

It shouldn't matter when their relationship started. This sucks. Funtatlaguy Feb 2024 #6

Unfortunately it does Sympthsical Feb 2024 #7

It's irrelevant to whether Willis has a conflict that adversely affects spooky3 Feb 2024 #18

I could cherry pick lawyers who see it oppositely Sympthsical Feb 2024 #21

He seems to have no clue when it started, though. TwilightZone Feb 2024 #22

He only needs to know one thing Sympthsical Feb 2024 #26

And he doesn't seem to know that one thing. TwilightZone Feb 2024 #37

Depends on the threshhold Sympthsical Feb 2024 #46

Considering that the judge called this just so that Bradley could testify... TwilightZone Feb 2024 #59

I think the judge wanted to get the fact Bradley was blabbing out there Sympthsical Feb 2024 #65

The area on the GPS is in an area where both have friends, there are bars etc. It doesn't matter and as a woman Demsrule86 Feb 2024 #55

We'll see Sympthsical Feb 2024 #57

The defense attorney is speaking in a rather high pitched voice today! madaboutharry Feb 2024 #5

Are you kidding me?................................ Lovie777 Feb 2024 #12

We don't disagree. madaboutharry Feb 2024 #16

Defense attorney looking like a neophyte. MOMFUDSKI Feb 2024 #8

Doesn't happen to me very often but bluestarone Feb 2024 #9

High-tech lynching cilla4progress Feb 2024 #10

I see a white, blonde woman all over a MOMFUDSKI Feb 2024 #41

Totally. cilla4progress Feb 2024 #42

The blonde lady is obnoxious - my guess is she is a deplorable. walkingman Feb 2024 #11

As a white former Georgian, I'd almost guarantee you that. Funtatlaguy Feb 2024 #15

who does she represent? FarPoint Feb 2024 #19

Michael Roman MichMan Feb 2024 #70

She definitely is that. But, I think it is meant to cover for an obvious lack of competency. hlthe2b Feb 2024 #20

At the beginning of the hearing a couple weeks ago, she said she had been involved in one of Wade's election campaigns. MichMan Feb 2024 #69

Keep your friends close, and your enemies closer. 😎 walkingman Feb 2024 #77

What an absolutely terrible judge -- why is he even allowing this????? jmellman Feb 2024 #13

The bad news... regnaD kciN Feb 2024 #24

I'm not a lawyer but she leads the witness on almost every question? walkingman Feb 2024 #25

You can if the witness is "adverse" or "hostile" Sympthsical Feb 2024 #28

Thanks....very interesting walkingman Feb 2024 #33

Isn't Bradley cilla4progress Feb 2024 #73

This was addressed in the first hearing Sympthsical Feb 2024 #76

It is pretty obvious they are on a fishing expedition, and the judge seems to be bending over JohnSJ Feb 2024 #14

The Divorce Lawyer for Nathan Wade is an absolute idiot Pachamama Feb 2024 #17

How did they get him to violate cilla4progress Feb 2024 #27

They didn't... Happy Hoosier Feb 2024 #45

I see. cilla4progress Feb 2024 #79

Merchant got where she needed to go Sympthsical Feb 2024 #23

Thanks for the recap senseandsensibility Feb 2024 #29

Can/should Wade do a rebuttal to Bradley? gab13by13 Feb 2024 #30

I don't believe so Sympthsical Feb 2024 #36

Big thanks for your concise explanation here, Sympthsical!!! Leghorn21 Feb 2024 #31

Sounds like he is an unreliable witness................... Lovie777 Feb 2024 #32

It sounds like - but don't quote me Sympthsical Feb 2024 #38

All to protect the orange clown. MOMFUDSKI Feb 2024 #43

Why in the world would Bradley feed info to Roman's lawyers? Patton French Feb 2024 #44

He was dropped from their firm after sexual assault allegations Sympthsical Feb 2024 #47

Good grief. Thanks. NT Patton French Feb 2024 #48

I think his original response to the defense lawyer was vindictive Jarqui Feb 2024 #66

Wade fired Bradley for mchill Feb 2024 #53

I don't think it all started with Bradley gab13by13 Feb 2024 #67

Prosecutors will get to this cilla4progress Feb 2024 #81

They absolutely will Sympthsical Feb 2024 #87

No cross. Damn, this is not good at all. F@%k Drumpf! toesonthenose Feb 2024 #88

I'm surprised! Sympthsical Feb 2024 #90

I have a feeling they didn't want to open up anything else. toesonthenose Feb 2024 #100

My "uh oh" moment Sympthsical Feb 2024 #102

I've been watching for ten minutes and have learned nothing. nolabear Feb 2024 #34

Zoom lawyer is Sadow Sympthsical Feb 2024 #39

Isn't this from the hearings last week? Nictuku Feb 2024 #35

Nope. This is live today. Ms. Toad Feb 2024 #78

Let me be clear angrychair Feb 2024 #40

Willis said in her 2020 campaign that she wouldn't date anyone who worked under her. elocs Feb 2024 #49

She has since said that statement was specific to employees MichMan Feb 2024 #51

Yes, cilla4progress Feb 2024 #60

"Since said" is qualified hair splitting & when you find you need to use that, then you have problems. elocs Feb 2024 #64

I really hate to say this, but based on what I'm hearing.... SKKY Feb 2024 #50

Feel like my head is going explode angrychair Feb 2024 #52

I mean it doesn't change the fact of the case against Trump... SKKY Feb 2024 #58

I'm not a lawyer angrychair Feb 2024 #63

That's what I've heard as well... SKKY Feb 2024 #75

Keep in my mind mchill Feb 2024 #56

Really? Have they met the Georgia criteria to disqualify her? I am not so sure JohnSJ Feb 2024 #74

Supposed luxury trips mchill Feb 2024 #98

I don't see a benefit either, and I don't see willfully lying either JohnSJ Feb 2024 #101

They aren't going to cross him...ugggg. Not good. toesonthenose Feb 2024 #86

Kaput? MorbidButterflyTat Feb 2024 #95

No, it just means the trail of Trump will likely not happen before the election... SKKY Feb 2024 #106

May I ask a question ? dweller Feb 2024 #54

Money split in the Wade-Bradley partnership. Ms. Toad Feb 2024 #82

Thank you dweller Feb 2024 #89

There was a lot of talk in the last hearing Ms. Toad Feb 2024 #93

This witness has no effin credibility malaise Feb 2024 #61

He's a defense witness, so, cilla4progress Feb 2024 #62

It seems he has trapped himself in previous statements. Model35mech Feb 2024 #68

Like an Attorney's Day Parade, this thing Sympthsical Feb 2024 #71

Wow, so far what I think I have seen is a cheap divorce lawyer ran his mouth walkingman Feb 2024 #72

Bingo! You are absolutely correct. Bradley ran his mouth. He's a gossip. I think the Judge Raven Feb 2024 #85

Is this Bradley guy the only source of... Think. Again. Feb 2024 #80

There is also Yeardley Sympthsical Feb 2024 #83

A disgruntled ex-employee of Willis did, as well. n/t Ms. Toad Feb 2024 #84

So two less than credible witnesses for defense mchill Feb 2024 #99

I have barely been following this, but intrepidity Feb 2024 #91

I like the judge DaBronx Feb 2024 #92

This is a ratfucking with TSF's fingerprints all over it spanone Feb 2024 #94

YIKES: Trump co-defendant's attorney caught with pants down on Zoom during hearing LetMyPeopleVote Feb 2024 #96

YIKES: Trump co-defendant's attorney caught with pants down on Zoom during hearing LetMyPeopleVote Feb 2024 #97

By the time the dust settles, I wonder who may end up potentially getting disbarred ? MichMan Feb 2024 #103

Judge me says... Mike Nelson Feb 2024 #104

The judge is being too easy on the idiots pushing this motion LetMyPeopleVote Feb 2024 #105