General Discussion

LetMyPeopleVote

(180,200 posts)

105. The judge is being too easy on the idiots pushing this motion

Reply to Beachnutt (Original post)

Tue Feb 27, 2024, 06:41 PM

Feb 2024

Link to tweet

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

106 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Fani Willis hearing live [View all] Beachnutt Feb 2024 OP

Message auto-removed Name removed Feb 2024 #1

This message was self-deleted by its author Beachnutt Feb 2024 #2

"I do not have knowledge of it starting, or when it started," Terrence Bradley said Tuesday" TwilightZone Feb 2024 #3

Woof Sympthsical Feb 2024 #4

It shouldn't matter when their relationship started. This sucks. Funtatlaguy Feb 2024 #6

Unfortunately it does Sympthsical Feb 2024 #7

It's irrelevant to whether Willis has a conflict that adversely affects spooky3 Feb 2024 #18

I could cherry pick lawyers who see it oppositely Sympthsical Feb 2024 #21

He seems to have no clue when it started, though. TwilightZone Feb 2024 #22

He only needs to know one thing Sympthsical Feb 2024 #26

And he doesn't seem to know that one thing. TwilightZone Feb 2024 #37

Depends on the threshhold Sympthsical Feb 2024 #46

Considering that the judge called this just so that Bradley could testify... TwilightZone Feb 2024 #59

I think the judge wanted to get the fact Bradley was blabbing out there Sympthsical Feb 2024 #65

The area on the GPS is in an area where both have friends, there are bars etc. It doesn't matter and as a woman Demsrule86 Feb 2024 #55

We'll see Sympthsical Feb 2024 #57

The defense attorney is speaking in a rather high pitched voice today! madaboutharry Feb 2024 #5

Are you kidding me?................................ Lovie777 Feb 2024 #12

We don't disagree. madaboutharry Feb 2024 #16

Defense attorney looking like a neophyte. MOMFUDSKI Feb 2024 #8

Doesn't happen to me very often but bluestarone Feb 2024 #9

High-tech lynching cilla4progress Feb 2024 #10

I see a white, blonde woman all over a MOMFUDSKI Feb 2024 #41

Totally. cilla4progress Feb 2024 #42

The blonde lady is obnoxious - my guess is she is a deplorable. walkingman Feb 2024 #11

As a white former Georgian, I'd almost guarantee you that. Funtatlaguy Feb 2024 #15

who does she represent? FarPoint Feb 2024 #19

Michael Roman MichMan Feb 2024 #70

She definitely is that. But, I think it is meant to cover for an obvious lack of competency. hlthe2b Feb 2024 #20

At the beginning of the hearing a couple weeks ago, she said she had been involved in one of Wade's election campaigns. MichMan Feb 2024 #69

Keep your friends close, and your enemies closer. 😎 walkingman Feb 2024 #77

What an absolutely terrible judge -- why is he even allowing this????? jmellman Feb 2024 #13

The bad news... regnaD kciN Feb 2024 #24

I'm not a lawyer but she leads the witness on almost every question? walkingman Feb 2024 #25

You can if the witness is "adverse" or "hostile" Sympthsical Feb 2024 #28

Thanks....very interesting walkingman Feb 2024 #33

Isn't Bradley cilla4progress Feb 2024 #73

This was addressed in the first hearing Sympthsical Feb 2024 #76

It is pretty obvious they are on a fishing expedition, and the judge seems to be bending over JohnSJ Feb 2024 #14

The Divorce Lawyer for Nathan Wade is an absolute idiot Pachamama Feb 2024 #17

How did they get him to violate cilla4progress Feb 2024 #27

They didn't... Happy Hoosier Feb 2024 #45

I see. cilla4progress Feb 2024 #79

Merchant got where she needed to go Sympthsical Feb 2024 #23

Thanks for the recap senseandsensibility Feb 2024 #29

Can/should Wade do a rebuttal to Bradley? gab13by13 Feb 2024 #30

I don't believe so Sympthsical Feb 2024 #36

Big thanks for your concise explanation here, Sympthsical!!! Leghorn21 Feb 2024 #31

Sounds like he is an unreliable witness................... Lovie777 Feb 2024 #32

It sounds like - but don't quote me Sympthsical Feb 2024 #38

All to protect the orange clown. MOMFUDSKI Feb 2024 #43

Why in the world would Bradley feed info to Roman's lawyers? Patton French Feb 2024 #44

He was dropped from their firm after sexual assault allegations Sympthsical Feb 2024 #47

Good grief. Thanks. NT Patton French Feb 2024 #48

I think his original response to the defense lawyer was vindictive Jarqui Feb 2024 #66

Wade fired Bradley for mchill Feb 2024 #53

I don't think it all started with Bradley gab13by13 Feb 2024 #67

Prosecutors will get to this cilla4progress Feb 2024 #81

They absolutely will Sympthsical Feb 2024 #87

No cross. Damn, this is not good at all. F@%k Drumpf! toesonthenose Feb 2024 #88

I'm surprised! Sympthsical Feb 2024 #90

I have a feeling they didn't want to open up anything else. toesonthenose Feb 2024 #100

My "uh oh" moment Sympthsical Feb 2024 #102

I've been watching for ten minutes and have learned nothing. nolabear Feb 2024 #34

Zoom lawyer is Sadow Sympthsical Feb 2024 #39

Isn't this from the hearings last week? Nictuku Feb 2024 #35

Nope. This is live today. Ms. Toad Feb 2024 #78

Let me be clear angrychair Feb 2024 #40

Willis said in her 2020 campaign that she wouldn't date anyone who worked under her. elocs Feb 2024 #49

She has since said that statement was specific to employees MichMan Feb 2024 #51

Yes, cilla4progress Feb 2024 #60

"Since said" is qualified hair splitting & when you find you need to use that, then you have problems. elocs Feb 2024 #64

I really hate to say this, but based on what I'm hearing.... SKKY Feb 2024 #50

Feel like my head is going explode angrychair Feb 2024 #52

I mean it doesn't change the fact of the case against Trump... SKKY Feb 2024 #58

I'm not a lawyer angrychair Feb 2024 #63

That's what I've heard as well... SKKY Feb 2024 #75

Keep in my mind mchill Feb 2024 #56

Really? Have they met the Georgia criteria to disqualify her? I am not so sure JohnSJ Feb 2024 #74

Supposed luxury trips mchill Feb 2024 #98

I don't see a benefit either, and I don't see willfully lying either JohnSJ Feb 2024 #101

They aren't going to cross him...ugggg. Not good. toesonthenose Feb 2024 #86

Kaput? MorbidButterflyTat Feb 2024 #95

No, it just means the trail of Trump will likely not happen before the election... SKKY Feb 2024 #106

May I ask a question ? dweller Feb 2024 #54

Money split in the Wade-Bradley partnership. Ms. Toad Feb 2024 #82

Thank you dweller Feb 2024 #89

There was a lot of talk in the last hearing Ms. Toad Feb 2024 #93

This witness has no effin credibility malaise Feb 2024 #61

He's a defense witness, so, cilla4progress Feb 2024 #62

It seems he has trapped himself in previous statements. Model35mech Feb 2024 #68

Like an Attorney's Day Parade, this thing Sympthsical Feb 2024 #71

Wow, so far what I think I have seen is a cheap divorce lawyer ran his mouth walkingman Feb 2024 #72

Bingo! You are absolutely correct. Bradley ran his mouth. He's a gossip. I think the Judge Raven Feb 2024 #85

Is this Bradley guy the only source of... Think. Again. Feb 2024 #80

There is also Yeardley Sympthsical Feb 2024 #83

A disgruntled ex-employee of Willis did, as well. n/t Ms. Toad Feb 2024 #84

So two less than credible witnesses for defense mchill Feb 2024 #99

I have barely been following this, but intrepidity Feb 2024 #91

I like the judge DaBronx Feb 2024 #92

This is a ratfucking with TSF's fingerprints all over it spanone Feb 2024 #94

YIKES: Trump co-defendant's attorney caught with pants down on Zoom during hearing LetMyPeopleVote Feb 2024 #96

YIKES: Trump co-defendant's attorney caught with pants down on Zoom during hearing LetMyPeopleVote Feb 2024 #97

By the time the dust settles, I wonder who may end up potentially getting disbarred ? MichMan Feb 2024 #103

Judge me says... Mike Nelson Feb 2024 #104

The judge is being too easy on the idiots pushing this motion LetMyPeopleVote Feb 2024 #105