David Carr-NY Times "For One Night at Fox, News tops Agenda"- article & MY RANT against CTers.

[sabrina 1]

35. So sad to see you trying so hard to make a crime out of something

that was far from a crime, it was a legal enterprise which every US citizen has a right to engage in if they abide by all the rules. While denying the treasonous crime committed by the USSC when they unconstitutionally interfered in an election and gave it to their choice which clearly was not the people's choice.

Nader did nothing wrong. The USSC violated the Constitution.

It boggles the mind to see so little outrage over an actual crime and so much outrage over a perfectly legal endeavor fully in line with our democratic principles.

Not to mention you are contradicting your own claims re Obama and Anonymous. You claim that Obama was so brilliant in his campaign he needed no assistance to help to him the election.

The campaign WAS very well run and that is why they won.

How come the campaign in 2000 was unable to overcome all the cheating and all the other candidates then? Maybe because one factor in that loss was that the campaign was not well run.

But then they didn't know back then how Republicans steal elections. By contrast, Obama had the advantage of all the activists over the past number of years who DID know and worked hard to prevent it.

Whose fault would it have been had Obama lost? Here's the answer, absent the USSC interfering, it would have been the fault of his campaign because it would have meant that they were ignoring all the attempts to steal this election. To their credit they did not. We learned from the theft of the 2000 and 2004 elections.

Nader had nothing to do with the loss of the 2000 election. That election was successfully stolen with the help of the USSC.