When The Supreme Court Rules Today, Remember This [View all]

[gab13by13]

Yeah I'm mainly talking to the legal beagles here. When the court rules if Trump should be removed from the Colorado ballot, or not, that doesn't mean that it interpreted the law correctly.

The Supreme Court's job is to call balls and strikes, with no partiality to the pitcher or to the opposing team. This court has shown that it is not impartial, this court has shown that it leans one way in favor of Benedict Donald.

So when the court does its thing today and rules that Trump is allowed on the ballot, my response will be, So what? We all knew that is how it would rule.

I only go to a handful of sources for my news and in this case, I go to a renowned judge, judge Luttig. Judge Luttig laid out the reasons why the Supreme Court should not allow Benedict Donald on any ballot, and I believe and trust in him, he would have made a fantastic justice.

The key point to watch for in this decision is the reasoning for allowing Benedict Donald on the ballot. The tell that the court was not impartial will be its flimsy reasoning. The only cure is to add more justices and I don't see that happening.