General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Justice for JFK [View all]billh58
(6,635 posts)at least partially identified the disconnect on this thread. Your use of the term "anti conspiracy people" is not totally accurate, at least in my case, and I suspect for others who disagree as well. The use of this phrase also assumes that there are "pro conspiracy people."
I don't discard the idea that a conspiracy may exist, and recognize that those who interpret certain pieces of information as supporting the possibility of a conspiracy, may well be correct. These "pieces of information," however, are at best speculation and are widely varied according to the source one chooses.
The fact that I, and others, choose not to rely on supposition and speculation and base our opinions on the available and very reasonable "one shooter" evidence presents a difference of opinion only, and not "anti" anything.
For those from both sides who have escalated this discussion to a level of pure vitriol, please at least listen to those who disagree. The fact is, that neither position can be completely substantiated. At least we can agree that a good man was taken much too soon, and hatred was a key factor in the assassination.
This concludes my sermon, and someone will be coming down the aisles to pass the plate...