Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Response to True Dough (Original post)

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

The motivation was not sexually predatory. no_hypocrisy Mar 2024 #1
The "big picture" would include the woman's perspective. yardwork Mar 2024 #17
Partially conceding to your point, anything's possible without statements from both of them. no_hypocrisy Mar 2024 #18
Thanks for seeing my point. Also, the context for the VA's directive... yardwork Mar 2024 #20
I read an account by the woman. Irish_Dem Mar 2024 #127
I recall an episode of MASH in which thucythucy Mar 2024 #22
I think ForgedCrank Mar 2024 #45
I remember hearing the history of this photo Sanity Claws Mar 2024 #52
I saw Rebl2 Mar 2024 #58
Fortunately, someone wised up and canceled this. Silent Type Mar 2024 #2
So, let me get this straight maxrandb Mar 2024 #3
I'd say they're both "inappropriate." thucythucy Mar 2024 #23
What could provide more justification maxrandb Mar 2024 #40
You seem to have a strange definition of "justification." thucythucy Mar 2024 #48
It's not strange maxrandb Mar 2024 #55
I'd use the word "excuse" thucythucy Mar 2024 #59
I agree. FalloutShelter Mar 2024 #30
I think we're capable of doing both. thucythucy Mar 2024 #49
I despise that photo. WhiskeyGrinder Mar 2024 #4
Remove it. 50 Shades Of Blue Mar 2024 #5
My only argument is... RoeVWade Mar 2024 #6
I've long made that exact argument, RoeVWade True Dough Mar 2024 #33
At least this actually happened... lame54 Mar 2024 #94
Only Sort Of ProfessorGAC Mar 2024 #115
Only the 2nd raising was staged, the 1st one wasn't. nt MarineCombatEngineer Mar 2024 #120
Many couples have recaptured the joy of the winning the war in this photo as engagement or even jimfields33 Mar 2024 #7
I agree. Leave it. OLDMDDEM Mar 2024 #13
I agree. Leave it. OLDMDDEM Mar 2024 #14
Agreed, leave it, MarineCombatEngineer Mar 2024 #121
Keep it. flying rabbit Mar 2024 #8
Leave it Shrek Mar 2024 #9
Whats next ever Time Life photo ? Historic NY Mar 2024 #10
That's terrific... PCIntern Mar 2024 #12
Yes, thank you! MorbidButterflyTat Mar 2024 #72
Since she died in 2010, it's a bit hard for them to have a reunion in 2012. Ms. Toad Mar 2024 #117
You know... PCIntern Mar 2024 #11
Thank you for sharing jimfields33 Mar 2024 #16
Stay. It's a glimpse into the euphoria of the time and place. This wasn't the only scene where people grabbed Liberal In Texas Mar 2024 #15
Thank you for adding this angle! True Dough Mar 2024 #21
Just look at the 2 old scolds in the background of the 2nd photo Barry Markson Mar 2024 #47
OMG how idiotic and stupid. There is such a thing as too politically correct and I ain't that. nt GuppyGal Mar 2024 #19
it should go jcgoldie Mar 2024 #24
Did the woman involved file a complaint? jalan48 Mar 2024 #25
Some historical context is required True Dough Mar 2024 #28
We're on the precipice of an autocratic takeover of our country. In that context I think focusing on this is ridiculous. jalan48 Mar 2024 #35
You'd advocate for the majority of threads on this forum True Dough Mar 2024 #39
I never said remove the post and didn't didn't intend this to be a personal attack on your response. jalan48 Mar 2024 #44
We apparently know more than that FBaggins Mar 2024 #46
Disagree. cilla4progress Mar 2024 #26
No it should not...is is iconic. And seriously we have more important stuff to do. Demsrule86 Mar 2024 #27
Keep it Raven123 Mar 2024 #29
IS it a photo of non-consensual contact? Think. Again. Mar 2024 #31
Precisely the crux of the issue, Think. Again. True Dough Mar 2024 #32
Perhaps a response as undefined as the issue is... Think. Again. Mar 2024 #38
Sounds fair and thoughtful to me True Dough Mar 2024 #43
FFS, learn some history. It was the end of WWII. People in the US were ecstatic, after living with rationing and sinkingfeeling Mar 2024 #34
Time did a nice piece on the photos taken in Times Square that day ripcord Mar 2024 #51
Her hand is gripped into a fist. She has been literally yanked off her feet. Her neck is pinioned in the crook of his Scrivener7 Mar 2024 #36
Apparently, thinking this is idiotic to some here. Marcus IM Mar 2024 #80
I don't feel attacked. I am used to often disagreeing with the majority here on Scrivener7 Mar 2024 #82
I agree with your visual analysis of the image, but in retrospect, she seems to be OK with it. Ms. Toad Mar 2024 #110
But look at her words here: Scrivener7 Mar 2024 #119
Keep it. (nt) Paladin Mar 2024 #37
I won't say yea or nay on this. Only: Aristus Mar 2024 #41
Point taken, True Dough Mar 2024 #42
It's a truly iconic image... Happy Hoosier Mar 2024 #50
The curl of her fingers is not that of someone caught up in a joyful moment ThreeNoSeep Mar 2024 #53
HER perspective, quoted in that article, is what has been missing in this thread so far. It's pretty damning. Scrivener7 Mar 2024 #90
What MorbidButterflyTat Mar 2024 #98
Do you see something in her words in the CBS article that contradicts her words in the WAPO article? Scrivener7 Mar 2024 #99
Those comments are actually from Greta Zimmer Friedman. Ms. Toad Mar 2024 #134
No, Ms. Toad! I know you didn't suggest it illustrates American values! I think you Scrivener7 Mar 2024 #135
You are correct. Ms. Toad Mar 2024 #137
No worries! Scrivener7 Mar 2024 #138
Disagree - leave it. LoisB Mar 2024 #54
There are NO politics in this Pulitzer Prize winning photo, just the exuberance of victory. ProudMNDemocrat Mar 2024 #56
I don't get it. grumpyduck Mar 2024 #57
Would be nuttier than squirrel shit to remove it BannonsLiver Mar 2024 #60
My problem with all the history erasure and cancel culture pinkstarburst Mar 2024 #61
Given that the woman involved was not offended and participated in a re-enactment many years later, this is just ratchiweenie Mar 2024 #62
Thank you for pointing that out True Dough Mar 2024 #70
Was it "joy of the moment"? ThreeNoSeep Mar 2024 #125
Images can act like Rorschach tests for all sorts of personal experiences. SYFROYH Mar 2024 #63
This is important historical context True Dough Mar 2024 #69
Keep it. nt Celerity Mar 2024 #64
Message auto-removed Name removed Mar 2024 #65
No, it should not be removed -misanthroptimist Mar 2024 #66
Let's not be like Florida wanting to rewrite and hide history. KS Toronado Mar 2024 #67
So, no one can even say with 100% certainty who the couple is XorXor Mar 2024 #68
YES, they can MorbidButterflyTat Mar 2024 #97
I did and that is why I said what said XorXor Mar 2024 #123
Leave it be! The woman in the photo has spoken for herself Silver Gaia Mar 2024 #71
Leave it, stop censoring the past. Oneironaut Mar 2024 #73
As old sailor, I say leave it! Emile Mar 2024 #74
Apparently they're doing it so what does it matter? BlueTsunami2018 Mar 2024 #75
The idea that it is even a question is a big reason we might get a lunatic moron (Trump) in the WH gulliver Mar 2024 #76
DISAGREE! It's an iconic image. beaglelover Mar 2024 #77
What's next if you censor this? Jilly_in_VA Mar 2024 #78
Can we not care? JustAnotherGen Mar 2024 #79
That nonconsensual kiss in soccer... Croney Mar 2024 #81
You could say that all those joyous anamnua Mar 2024 #83
Drilling down, I think joy is the real reason why some object to it. BannonsLiver Mar 2024 #92
Leave it. Smh The Third Doctor Mar 2024 #84
I'm glad I'm old. This kind of stuff sounds ridiculous. Can't believe it is even being debated. walkingman Mar 2024 #85
Leave it. ificandream Mar 2024 #86
not until the orange orc is in jail or dead. AllaN01Bear Mar 2024 #87
Get a grip! MorbidButterflyTat Mar 2024 #88
Keep It rollin74 Mar 2024 #89
Disagree Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Mar 2024 #91
RimaAnn Nelson Should be fired immediately BannonsLiver Mar 2024 #93
How does RimaAnn Nelson know it was non consensual? NT Patton French Mar 2024 #95
Glad to see all the problems with the VA has been solved DetroitLegalBeagle Mar 2024 #96
There's nothing worse than judging HISTORY by modern day standards. WarGamer Mar 2024 #100
Disagree 100% underpants Mar 2024 #101
Disagree, elleng Mar 2024 #102
Ridiculous Mountainguy Mar 2024 #103
Finally, the woman's side of the story senseandsensibility Mar 2024 #106
She could come back from the dead and lecture the people who seem to think they speak for her in the thread BannonsLiver Mar 2024 #113
No shit MorbidButterflyTat Mar 2024 #116
Agreed. It's "trying too hard" for progressive street cred IMO. BannonsLiver Mar 2024 #118
Progressives seem like they always Mountainguy Mar 2024 #124
It's getting ridiculous. MorbidButterflyTat Mar 2024 #128
Didn't they find that women years later.. Omnipresent Mar 2024 #104
How do they know it was non-consensual? n/t TygrBright Mar 2024 #105
It should be removed. CrispyQ Mar 2024 #107
Of course some stuff is worth digging into. Prairie_Seagull Mar 2024 #108
Keep it. pandr32 Mar 2024 #109
Oh, good heavens. That's an iconic photo. They need to get a grip. Vinca Mar 2024 #111
The stop action of photos, makes a kiss look like it lasts forever. LakeArenal Mar 2024 #112
Agree johnp3907 Mar 2024 #114
How do we know it was non-consensual? Goodheart Mar 2024 #122
No RandySF Mar 2024 #126
Disagree. Xavier Breath Mar 2024 #129
I appreciate the varied opinions in this thread True Dough Mar 2024 #130
Definitely leave it alone!!! nt Raine Mar 2024 #131
Did she file a complaint? OAITW r.2.0 Mar 2024 #132
Unconsentual surrender. Timeflyer Mar 2024 #133
we need to stop this bad time travel shit. that was THEN, this is NOW. its a great photo. it was a euphoric time. pansypoo53219 Mar 2024 #136
A kiss is just a kiss. From the film Casablamca. Ping Tung Mar 2024 #139
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Agree or disagree: Iconic...»Reply #65