Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

shrike3

(5,370 posts)
24. I agree completely. It's his opinion. The Times ran it, but it's his opinion.
Thu Mar 7, 2024, 01:07 PM
Mar 2024

Papers do that all the time, run opinion pieces by people from all across the political spectrum.

I'm glad you found his association with Hoover jarring as well. I saw that, and went, "Woah."

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Warning: the article above is from the NYT... Think. Again. Mar 2024 #1
And as we all know, high-education Times readers will say... brooklynite Mar 2024 #2
That's a very simplistic view... Think. Again. Mar 2024 #3
propaganda works on a repetetive, long term basis - the daily tearing down of Biden like the death of a thousand cuts Blues Heron Mar 2024 #4
It's a hyperbolic statement that artificially elevates Trump tinrobot Mar 2024 #13
Yeah, and they had absolutely no impact at all on Hillary's campaign, Bill's fortunes. shrike3 Mar 2024 #18
Good points senseandsensibility Mar 2024 #37
"That delay is both a devastating blow to President Biden's campaign " BULL SHIT Ferrets are Cool Mar 2024 #5
I agree bdamomma Mar 2024 #6
Didn't see any DUers applauding SC's decision among all the criticism. So, yeah it was a blow. We can land blows too. Silent Type Mar 2024 #29
I guess the NYT's can't comprehend that Democrat's can multitask............... Lovie777 Mar 2024 #7
This is an Op-Ed column. Basic LA Mar 2024 #8
The editors of the NYT control their op-ed page. Voltaire2 Mar 2024 #9
They control who writes the op-eds Basic LA Mar 2024 #10
They absolutely have editorial control over what gets published. Voltaire2 Mar 2024 #12
They can spike a column, I guess. Basic LA Mar 2024 #14
They decide who to publish and who to ignore. Lonestarblue Mar 2024 #11
That was a Guest Columnist piece. Basic LA Mar 2024 #15
He's a journalist. He previously covered politics for the Washington Post shrike3 Mar 2024 #16
He's had a long distinguished career Basic LA Mar 2024 #19
I've never heard of the guy. Times has some well-known liberals. He's not one of them. shrike3 Mar 2024 #20
I missed that Hoover bit. You're right. Basic LA Mar 2024 #23
I agree completely. It's his opinion. The Times ran it, but it's his opinion. shrike3 Mar 2024 #24
And look at everything else. WTH? Basic LA Mar 2024 #27
The Times sure seems determined to bury Biden shrike3 Mar 2024 #17
WTF?! Mad_Machine76 Mar 2024 #21
But he made the rich richer orthoclad Mar 2024 #31
Oh, okay. Elessar Zappa Mar 2024 #22
Garland waited too long BannonsLiver Mar 2024 #25
I wonder why? orthoclad Mar 2024 #32
I would like to thank everyone who contributed to this thread for talking me back from the edge. ariadne0614 Mar 2024 #26
I Just Got Off The Phone.... pdxflyboy Mar 2024 #28
Was this Op-Ed the final straw? maxsolomon Mar 2024 #36
"It's not a word we use in The New York Times." shrike3 Mar 2024 #30
Yes, why would a rich hereditary publisher, orthoclad Mar 2024 #33
+1. And please don't call Trump a liar dalton99a Mar 2024 #34
Aren't they precious? shrike3 Mar 2024 #35
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»'This Could Well Be Game ...»Reply #24