Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

graham4anything

(11,464 posts)
63. It was proven false above on this thread by someone living in Ohio. I trust they would know
Sat Nov 24, 2012, 04:34 AM
Nov 2012

and the writers above mostly are way left writers, who's job is in keeping memes alive and making aliving that way.

You do know the far left is while not as bad, almost as bad as the far right.

Why do you all wish to discredit President Obama's predicted by me, landslide election that he attained (and one in which he received more votes(and counting still) than Bush did in 2004.

Had Kerry received the same number of votes as Obama did, indeed, he would have been President, Al Gore too.

Of course Al Gore and Bush did not get 50% thanks to Ralph Nader.

Strange oddity about Al Gore-he was sold down the river by the far left(including many of the above writers) in 2004. He was NOT allowed to run, was told he wouldn't be supported and he opted out early, supporting Howard Dean (who was sold down the river by the democrats too.

But the far left loved to use Al Gore and his name. And later of course sort of came back to him because of the climate change movement, though not for President.

Why wasn't Al Gore given a rematch? Pre-911, it was widely assumed Bush43 would be a failure, one term president. So why wasn't he given a rematch.

And why did the far left never fully back Kerry, who only was the #2 or #3 liberal in congress?
Why was it the far left attempts to ruin any democrat who can win, yet loves Ralph Nader?

if you find the answer, let me know.

BTW-Bobby Jr. did NOT back Obama when the rest of his family did. That was one blight on 2008 to so go against Teddy like that.

OH wait, the far left in 2000 backed BILL I TAKE MY BALL HOME BRADLEY- who lost badley
and whined and told the dems to f-off.
You remember Bill Bradley don't you? He of the 1% rich boy frat who was a star hall of fame basketball player don't you?

Who never supported Gore after Bradley's embarrassing Primary loss

(and the far left backed Russ Whiny took his ball home and became a super lobbyist himself Feingold. When he could have beaten that draconian in his state, but was super soreloser at losing and didn't step up to the plate and went AWOL.)

Yet the far left continue to use Al Gore for their conspiracy theories. Ones in which Al Gore himself did not ask them to do.
But Al was thrown into the river in 2004 for Howard Dean.(who shortly later on was himself tossed in the river.)

my, wasn't that special as the Church Lady might have said.

(and the far left tossed Kerry in the river and whined and whined while some of them were attempting to perpetuate the biggest fraud on the democrats ever, the $400 haircut man John "chuckie" Edwards, who's sole claim to fame was being mega-1% rich, and lying to the public by telling them he was poor, and tell me, how many of his clients got rich as their lawyer did?)Populist?


And remember, you must NOT vote for Andrew Cuomo because of the smear that most people know Andrew was responsible for in Mario Cuomo's race vs. Ed Koch.

WINNING. Which is the only thing of importance.

And Chicago wins. They did in 1960, 1964, 2008 and 2012.

Maybe instead of Joe Lieberman, Al should have rightly picked Rev. Jackson (or Kerry himself too). And then Chicago would have won those two races handily. So a suppposed theft in 2000 would not have happened.
And where is the far left in investigating what is probably the ONE CT that is actually true?
The murder of Paul Wellstone who was Wellstoned not once but twice, the second time being at the celebration of his life.
Where is the investigating that? I always wondered. Had Gore picked Wellstone and not LIeberman if Gore so wanted a Jewish person on his ticket, he would have been better off.
As a Jewish person myself I was proud when Joe was picked, but who the 'ell was Joe Lieberman anyhow? Us NY/NJers never had heard of him prior to that.

and where was the far left when the last real reporter in mainstream news, Dan Rather was also sold down the river?
They abandoned him, even though his info was spot on and it was never proven the memo itself was fake.
Huh?

I will take Ted Kennedy liberalism over the far left any day.At least Ted Kennedy achieved goals for 50 years and didn't dwell on the past tragedies.(and if anyone had a right to say retire privately and get high every day, after the deaths of JFK and RFK and all the other tragedy in that family, it was Teddy.

But Teddy overcame and stood tall, and died a Saint among men.
And with President Obama, the Dream lives on.
Not from a conspiracy theory, but from CHICAGO.

My kind of town, Chicago is (c)Sammy Cahn and Jimmy Van Heusen and sung by Frank Sinatra, the Chairmen of the Board himself.
Chicago, where unions still rule and democrats win the presidency.
I sure wish Hillary would run from that state
(it is like when a baseball player goes into the Hall of Fame who played for more than one team, they got the choice which hat to wear.(recently I believe that was changed).

But Hillary running WITH Chicago 100% support will win 400 electoral votes plus

(and please democrats-now is not the time to give up the electoral votes. Please keep them, and lets make Puerto Rico the 51st state, and how about Mexico the 52nd.
I hear Fox (the president) wants to change the name anyhow.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

David Carr-the media equation "For One Night at Fox, News tops Agenda"- graham4anything Nov 2012 #1
Good read n/t malaise Nov 2012 #3
Fox's part in the apparatus began long before the election JHB Nov 2012 #10
News my as* --- they just didn't want to be permanently associated with THE LOSER!! nt Tigress DEM Nov 2012 #58
Thank you OKNancy Nov 2012 #2
I don't think there are any people who would glowing Nov 2012 #4
+1 DeeDeeNY Nov 2012 #6
+2 bahrbearian Nov 2012 #21
Without all that hard work by the Obama team, Obama would never have won but.... fasttense Nov 2012 #5
i think so too barbtries Nov 2012 #7
I must disagree with you about 2016 and 2020. Jim Lane Nov 2012 #8
Those who forget history nadinbrzezinski Nov 2012 #9
Those who are confined by history are trapped into repeating it. randome Nov 2012 #12
Well, barring little things like, say alcibiades_mystery Nov 2012 #11
SO you think the GOP is done nadinbrzezinski Nov 2012 #13
No, I think using 1964 and 1972 is just plain silly alcibiades_mystery Nov 2012 #17
It's not a silly analogy because it's not an analogy. It's just a warning against complacency. Jim Lane Nov 2012 #40
1968 was the democrats fault for tossing the 3rd greatest president ever in the river graham4anything Nov 2012 #16
"Vietnam was a stupid wedge issue distraction..." alcibiades_mystery Nov 2012 #18
That stood out to me also and gave me a sort of nasty feeling in the pit sabrina 1 Nov 2012 #24
I see your strategy but I am not biting. graham4anything Nov 2012 #28
Isn't life itself performance art? (referencing the response above) graham4anything Nov 2012 #38
Life is indeed a work of art alcibiades_mystery Nov 2012 #64
add my 80,000 plus posts at CGCS with the 3000s more Kerry board,& 1000s more on Gore boards graham4anything Nov 2012 #70
We must stay aggressive. Obama's OFA is still active, just go to it's website. The organization bluestate10 Nov 2012 #19
Yes President Obama won fair and square nadinbrzezinski Nov 2012 #14
Nader and the 97,000 people that voted for him in Florida put Bush in office. The sooner that bluestate10 Nov 2012 #20
Wrong , Nader was right. bahrbearian Nov 2012 #22
Problem is, and this is puzzling, well not really... nadinbrzezinski Nov 2012 #23
THE SUPREME COURT- you mean the one that Nader lied and said Bush/Gore were the same? graham4anything Nov 2012 #29
Escuse me, but NADER had nothing to do with taht decision nadinbrzezinski Nov 2012 #30
Again, if Gore won NH, the US Supreme Court would never have been called in. Election over in NH graham4anything Nov 2012 #31
What I do not understand is your hate for the democratic system nadinbrzezinski Nov 2012 #34
So sad to see you trying so hard to make a crime out of something sabrina 1 Nov 2012 #35
You lost your own point. Gore/Kerry did not have the community organization Obama did. graham4anything Nov 2012 #37
Wrong, but keep on thinking that. Thankfully a majority of Dems sabrina 1 Nov 2012 #25
Blaming Nader stops Democrats from wasting their vote again in any new election graham4anything Nov 2012 #27
Are you that ingnorant of history? nadinbrzezinski Nov 2012 #33
I have nothing against that. 50% should be required though. with a runoff. graham4anything Nov 2012 #36
We have 52 states? zappaman Nov 2012 #81
I don't know what to say to you if you think that blaming Nader sabrina 1 Nov 2012 #39
Before you call people names, let me ask you-were you on the street protesting in 2000 in Fl or DC? graham4anything Nov 2012 #42
They will never admit it. One of the 99 Nov 2012 #54
The persistent claim that Anonymous somehow... bvar22 Nov 2012 #15
"WE WON FAIR AND SQUARE and nobody could have or would have stolen it because WE WON..." Snarkoleptic Nov 2012 #26
Al Gore didn't get to say it because of Ralph Nader. graham4anything Nov 2012 #32
Nader was a factor, but if all votes had been counted we'd never had to suffer Bewsh. Snarkoleptic Nov 2012 #41
SHh, already mentioned that, but nadinbrzezinski Nov 2012 #43
If one believes Nader, then one agrees Bush and Gore were the same & Bush&Kerry the same graham4anything Nov 2012 #44
I'm a Gore fan RobertEarl Nov 2012 #45
as President Obama says FORWARD. Gore won NH without Nader. graham4anything Nov 2012 #46
Go to bed RobertEarl Nov 2012 #48
This thread is about how President Obama won with no help from a hacker graham4anything Nov 2012 #50
I've always wondered if this 'blame Nader' was meant sabrina 1 Nov 2012 #78
I see Nader blamers as authoritarians RobertEarl Nov 2012 #80
While you prattle on Nader nadinbrzezinski Nov 2012 #60
This thread is being hijacked by Ralph Nader fans. A terrorist hacker did not help President Obama graham4anything Nov 2012 #47
You have Nader on the brain? RobertEarl Nov 2012 #49
stop with the conspiracy theories. Terrorist hackers belong in jail. Anarchy is not democracy. graham4anything Nov 2012 #51
Right E-vote is anarchy RobertEarl Nov 2012 #52
So do you believe Nader's line that Bush and Gore were one and the same? graham4anything Nov 2012 #53
Get Nader off your head RobertEarl Nov 2012 #55
Funny you and the 2 others do not answer that question. Backing Nader means believing his lies. graham4anything Nov 2012 #57
Vote for Hillary in 2016 and make sure Jeb doesn't win. Then there is no problem. graham4anything Nov 2012 #56
What if...perish the though, Hillary don't run? nadinbrzezinski Nov 2012 #59
Vote for Michelle. And keep Chicago together.Remember, Chicago wins elections and is a good word graham4anything Nov 2012 #62
And Michelle is running? nadinbrzezinski Nov 2012 #65
2025-2032. Michelle46, followed by Chelsea47 after Hillary45 and President Obama44 retire graham4anything Nov 2012 #69
We call that a coronation, not an election nadinbrzezinski Nov 2012 #73
What do you mean it's been proven false?? reusrename Nov 2012 #61
It was proven false above on this thread by someone living in Ohio. I trust they would know graham4anything Nov 2012 #63
I agree with everything you say, especially the part about Wellstone. reusrename Nov 2012 #66
RUUUNNNN. COMIES UNDER MY BED!!! nadinbrzezinski Nov 2012 #68
152 electoral votes. And they would all be Dem votes. Very simple, once you understand graham4anything Nov 2012 #71
No, there is no brain freeze here nadinbrzezinski Nov 2012 #72
If you believe in an anarchist who cowardly doesn't reveal their name(the hacker) then admit it. graham4anything Nov 2012 #74
Lead a horse to water comes at this point nadinbrzezinski Nov 2012 #75
What you are saying is...(I think) that... graham4anything Nov 2012 #76
No, that is what you are saying nadinbrzezinski Nov 2012 #77
No, that is what you are saying. If we both are saying it, then we are in agreement. graham4anything Nov 2012 #79
Ah red baiting again nadinbrzezinski Nov 2012 #82
the only red I bait is redstates. I love socialists & Communists. Especially REAL ones. graham4anything Nov 2012 #83
Are you saying the 2000 and 2004 elections were not stolen? sabrina 1 Nov 2012 #84
Dirty tricks changed 2000, yes. But dirty tricks have been part of many an election. graham4anything Nov 2012 #87
So you don't believe the 2000 and 2004 elections were stolen. That's all I wanted sabrina 1 Nov 2012 #88
No one mentioned any terrorist hacker. Can you link to that information please? sabrina 1 Nov 2012 #85
the guy/woman with no name. Whom you have credited with stopping Karl Rove. graham4anything Nov 2012 #86
You're not making any sense. Maybe you thought you were talking sabrina 1 Nov 2012 #89
It was a great GOTV effort, but it doesn't deny the fact that an election can easily be joeybee12 Nov 2012 #67
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»David Carr-NY Times "...»Reply #63