Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
68. RUUUNNNN. COMIES UNDER MY BED!!!
Sat Nov 24, 2012, 12:57 PM
Nov 2012

So if we even think that facts actually happened, like the SCOTUS issuing a decision in Bush v Gore that was supposed not to be precedent...that we are far left commies?

I love red baiting in the morning.

By the way, I am actually, like for real, a reporter. One of my local beats IS City Hall. I deal with actual, well you know...pesky facts. One of those pesky facts is the USSC stopped the count, not Nader. You can jump all you want up and down, it is simply not so. Another is that the NYT did indeed publish on 9/11 a report where Gore actually, I know shocking, won Florida.

In the reality we happen to live the OH servers did indeed go dark both in 2004 and 2012. We know in 2004 Kerry was leading and when they came back up Bush was leading. We know the data stream did go through servers in TN that night. These are facts.

We know that this year the servers went dark at exactly the same time.

We also know there was vote flipping in the spring during the Republican primaries.

If that makes me a commie, that is understanding the facts...are you now doing the McCarthy thing? Have you ever been a member of the Communist Party?

I can tell you this...nor is this an ad hominen, this s a fact. You really have no clue how the political system works. None, who is a professional observer is willing to say who will run in 2016. We have very early explorations, both Santorum (has a website up already likely more to retire his debt) and Rubio (went to OH already) are thinking about it.

In the dem side none has made any. What SOS Clinton has indicated is tat she needs a long vacation. We will not know for at least two years (2014 hmmm) if she's even thinking about it. Michelle? Now cue the laughtract. Why would any voter cast their vote for POTUS for her? Being FLOYUS hardly qualifies. She might run for office to get both a record and experience. That won't happen before 2018.

So that is how the real world works.

By the way, I guess in your case facts have a commie bent.

I have not been called a far left in a long time...well, thank you. I should feel honored.

(Oh and did not chose to go into the whole screed on Welstone...performance act indeed

Oh and I will go into Mexico. The President is NOT Fox, he hasn't been in 6 years. The current President, Calderon, just wants to change the official name, going to 1824, Estados Unidos Mexicanos, to Mexico.

Get's worst. Looked at a map lately? You want to make a country of over 90 million, with 32 States and one Federal District a single state in the US? You and what army? Oh and unlike DC, that Federal District, otherwise known as Mexico City, now self rules and has full representation in the Mexican Congress and Senate. We could learn a lesson with DC.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

David Carr-the media equation "For One Night at Fox, News tops Agenda"- graham4anything Nov 2012 #1
Good read n/t malaise Nov 2012 #3
Fox's part in the apparatus began long before the election JHB Nov 2012 #10
News my as* --- they just didn't want to be permanently associated with THE LOSER!! nt Tigress DEM Nov 2012 #58
Thank you OKNancy Nov 2012 #2
I don't think there are any people who would glowing Nov 2012 #4
+1 DeeDeeNY Nov 2012 #6
+2 bahrbearian Nov 2012 #21
Without all that hard work by the Obama team, Obama would never have won but.... fasttense Nov 2012 #5
i think so too barbtries Nov 2012 #7
I must disagree with you about 2016 and 2020. Jim Lane Nov 2012 #8
Those who forget history nadinbrzezinski Nov 2012 #9
Those who are confined by history are trapped into repeating it. randome Nov 2012 #12
Well, barring little things like, say alcibiades_mystery Nov 2012 #11
SO you think the GOP is done nadinbrzezinski Nov 2012 #13
No, I think using 1964 and 1972 is just plain silly alcibiades_mystery Nov 2012 #17
It's not a silly analogy because it's not an analogy. It's just a warning against complacency. Jim Lane Nov 2012 #40
1968 was the democrats fault for tossing the 3rd greatest president ever in the river graham4anything Nov 2012 #16
"Vietnam was a stupid wedge issue distraction..." alcibiades_mystery Nov 2012 #18
That stood out to me also and gave me a sort of nasty feeling in the pit sabrina 1 Nov 2012 #24
I see your strategy but I am not biting. graham4anything Nov 2012 #28
Isn't life itself performance art? (referencing the response above) graham4anything Nov 2012 #38
Life is indeed a work of art alcibiades_mystery Nov 2012 #64
add my 80,000 plus posts at CGCS with the 3000s more Kerry board,& 1000s more on Gore boards graham4anything Nov 2012 #70
We must stay aggressive. Obama's OFA is still active, just go to it's website. The organization bluestate10 Nov 2012 #19
Yes President Obama won fair and square nadinbrzezinski Nov 2012 #14
Nader and the 97,000 people that voted for him in Florida put Bush in office. The sooner that bluestate10 Nov 2012 #20
Wrong , Nader was right. bahrbearian Nov 2012 #22
Problem is, and this is puzzling, well not really... nadinbrzezinski Nov 2012 #23
THE SUPREME COURT- you mean the one that Nader lied and said Bush/Gore were the same? graham4anything Nov 2012 #29
Escuse me, but NADER had nothing to do with taht decision nadinbrzezinski Nov 2012 #30
Again, if Gore won NH, the US Supreme Court would never have been called in. Election over in NH graham4anything Nov 2012 #31
What I do not understand is your hate for the democratic system nadinbrzezinski Nov 2012 #34
So sad to see you trying so hard to make a crime out of something sabrina 1 Nov 2012 #35
You lost your own point. Gore/Kerry did not have the community organization Obama did. graham4anything Nov 2012 #37
Wrong, but keep on thinking that. Thankfully a majority of Dems sabrina 1 Nov 2012 #25
Blaming Nader stops Democrats from wasting their vote again in any new election graham4anything Nov 2012 #27
Are you that ingnorant of history? nadinbrzezinski Nov 2012 #33
I have nothing against that. 50% should be required though. with a runoff. graham4anything Nov 2012 #36
We have 52 states? zappaman Nov 2012 #81
I don't know what to say to you if you think that blaming Nader sabrina 1 Nov 2012 #39
Before you call people names, let me ask you-were you on the street protesting in 2000 in Fl or DC? graham4anything Nov 2012 #42
They will never admit it. One of the 99 Nov 2012 #54
The persistent claim that Anonymous somehow... bvar22 Nov 2012 #15
"WE WON FAIR AND SQUARE and nobody could have or would have stolen it because WE WON..." Snarkoleptic Nov 2012 #26
Al Gore didn't get to say it because of Ralph Nader. graham4anything Nov 2012 #32
Nader was a factor, but if all votes had been counted we'd never had to suffer Bewsh. Snarkoleptic Nov 2012 #41
SHh, already mentioned that, but nadinbrzezinski Nov 2012 #43
If one believes Nader, then one agrees Bush and Gore were the same & Bush&Kerry the same graham4anything Nov 2012 #44
I'm a Gore fan RobertEarl Nov 2012 #45
as President Obama says FORWARD. Gore won NH without Nader. graham4anything Nov 2012 #46
Go to bed RobertEarl Nov 2012 #48
This thread is about how President Obama won with no help from a hacker graham4anything Nov 2012 #50
I've always wondered if this 'blame Nader' was meant sabrina 1 Nov 2012 #78
I see Nader blamers as authoritarians RobertEarl Nov 2012 #80
While you prattle on Nader nadinbrzezinski Nov 2012 #60
This thread is being hijacked by Ralph Nader fans. A terrorist hacker did not help President Obama graham4anything Nov 2012 #47
You have Nader on the brain? RobertEarl Nov 2012 #49
stop with the conspiracy theories. Terrorist hackers belong in jail. Anarchy is not democracy. graham4anything Nov 2012 #51
Right E-vote is anarchy RobertEarl Nov 2012 #52
So do you believe Nader's line that Bush and Gore were one and the same? graham4anything Nov 2012 #53
Get Nader off your head RobertEarl Nov 2012 #55
Funny you and the 2 others do not answer that question. Backing Nader means believing his lies. graham4anything Nov 2012 #57
Vote for Hillary in 2016 and make sure Jeb doesn't win. Then there is no problem. graham4anything Nov 2012 #56
What if...perish the though, Hillary don't run? nadinbrzezinski Nov 2012 #59
Vote for Michelle. And keep Chicago together.Remember, Chicago wins elections and is a good word graham4anything Nov 2012 #62
And Michelle is running? nadinbrzezinski Nov 2012 #65
2025-2032. Michelle46, followed by Chelsea47 after Hillary45 and President Obama44 retire graham4anything Nov 2012 #69
We call that a coronation, not an election nadinbrzezinski Nov 2012 #73
What do you mean it's been proven false?? reusrename Nov 2012 #61
It was proven false above on this thread by someone living in Ohio. I trust they would know graham4anything Nov 2012 #63
I agree with everything you say, especially the part about Wellstone. reusrename Nov 2012 #66
RUUUNNNN. COMIES UNDER MY BED!!! nadinbrzezinski Nov 2012 #68
152 electoral votes. And they would all be Dem votes. Very simple, once you understand graham4anything Nov 2012 #71
No, there is no brain freeze here nadinbrzezinski Nov 2012 #72
If you believe in an anarchist who cowardly doesn't reveal their name(the hacker) then admit it. graham4anything Nov 2012 #74
Lead a horse to water comes at this point nadinbrzezinski Nov 2012 #75
What you are saying is...(I think) that... graham4anything Nov 2012 #76
No, that is what you are saying nadinbrzezinski Nov 2012 #77
No, that is what you are saying. If we both are saying it, then we are in agreement. graham4anything Nov 2012 #79
Ah red baiting again nadinbrzezinski Nov 2012 #82
the only red I bait is redstates. I love socialists & Communists. Especially REAL ones. graham4anything Nov 2012 #83
Are you saying the 2000 and 2004 elections were not stolen? sabrina 1 Nov 2012 #84
Dirty tricks changed 2000, yes. But dirty tricks have been part of many an election. graham4anything Nov 2012 #87
So you don't believe the 2000 and 2004 elections were stolen. That's all I wanted sabrina 1 Nov 2012 #88
No one mentioned any terrorist hacker. Can you link to that information please? sabrina 1 Nov 2012 #85
the guy/woman with no name. Whom you have credited with stopping Karl Rove. graham4anything Nov 2012 #86
You're not making any sense. Maybe you thought you were talking sabrina 1 Nov 2012 #89
It was a great GOTV effort, but it doesn't deny the fact that an election can easily be joeybee12 Nov 2012 #67
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»David Carr-NY Times "...»Reply #68