Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

edhopper

(37,375 posts)

8. Because Biden did not appoint Hur

Reply to bigtree (Reply #4)

Tue Mar 12, 2024, 01:34 PM

Mar 2024

Garland did. Biden needs to stay out of it. Garland needs to step up and do the right thing.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

5 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Think. Again.SoCalDavidS WA-03 Democrat Dixc Habitation

43 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

I think Garland needs to come out [View all] edhopper Mar 2024 OP

After issuing his unedited report? MichMan Mar 2024 #1

Garland obviously doesn't feel that way. Irish_Dem Mar 2024 #2

he's complicit in the exoneration the president touted? bigtree Mar 2024 #6

But isn't giving the Republicans want they want or expected underpants Mar 2024 #3

why do you think the president hasn't said anything like you've counseled? bigtree Mar 2024 #4

Because Biden did not appoint Hur edhopper Mar 2024 #8

he hasn't said a word against that appointment bigtree Mar 2024 #18

Again edhopper Mar 2024 #19

that's probably the dumbest thing he should do. bigtree Mar 2024 #21

Or edhopper Mar 2024 #23

you must not be watching the hearing bigtree Mar 2024 #26

Most of America is not watching the hearing edhopper Mar 2024 #27

a statement by Garland would be about everything except the exoneration bigtree Mar 2024 #29

We disagree edhopper Mar 2024 #30

Garland is on his way out the door. MOMFUDSKI Mar 2024 #5

Trump wishes. bigtree Mar 2024 #7

Probably after the re-election edhopper Mar 2024 #9

while DOJ is fighting the Supreme Court TODAY bigtree Mar 2024 #16

That would be one way... Think. Again. Mar 2024 #10

so he should help Trump by removing the man who effectively caused him to be prosecuted? bigtree Mar 2024 #20

I definitely think garland should be replaced by Jack Smith! Think. Again. Mar 2024 #22

that seems a good measure of what you're promoting here bigtree Mar 2024 #25

Thank you for bestowing your precious wisdom on me! Think. Again. Mar 2024 #28

I bring receipts. bigtree Mar 2024 #32

(pssst...ya got nuthin.) Think. Again. Mar 2024 #33

says the person posting Garland attacks on a republican abuses thread bigtree Mar 2024 #34

I don't trust garland. Think. Again. Mar 2024 #37

the man who prosecuted over 100 white supremacist trump supporting Capitol rioters bigtree Mar 2024 #38

Garland should have started from the top down, not rounding up the mostly PufPuf23 Mar 2024 #40

he did. bigtree Mar 2024 #41

Too bad you feel the need to insult others to have a conversation. nt PufPuf23 Mar 2024 #42

I'll tell you what's insulting bigtree Mar 2024 #43

That would be a monumentally dumb thing to do. TwilightZone Mar 2024 #11

don't hold your breath... berksdem Mar 2024 #12

After today's hearing what purpose would that serve? Who would benefit? Fiendish Thingy Mar 2024 #13

I will wait and see if today's hearing edhopper Mar 2024 #15

That would just be another chapter for his book, do out in 23-months, look for it. Hotler Mar 2024 #14

Don't matter, damage done. nt Hotler Mar 2024 #17

why is an exoneration 'damage?' bigtree Mar 2024 #24

Because the main take away from most of the Media edhopper Mar 2024 #31

well, the main aim of the people wanting Garland to make a stink about this independent prosecutor bigtree Mar 2024 #35

Because edhopper Mar 2024 #36

it's just weird to refuse to call for the firing of the man who's responsible for hiring the SC who's prosecuting Trump bigtree Mar 2024 #39