Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Bernie: ''Moving to a 32-hour workweek with no loss in pay is not radical" [View all]MichMan
(17,155 posts)46. When is it scheduled to be voted on in the Senate? n/t
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
143 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Bernie: ''Moving to a 32-hour workweek with no loss in pay is not radical" [View all]
Donkees
Mar 2024
OP
How does a business that needs to be open 5 days a week to meet their customer's needs survive?
MichMan
Mar 2024
#3
I keep hearing that the private sector is a hotbed of innovation and can-do spirit.
Aristus
Mar 2024
#4
Require overtime pay at time and a half for workdays longer than eight hours ...
Donkees
Mar 2024
#8
I was thinking of UAW president Fain who wanted 32 hours a week max for all workers for more leisure time
MichMan
Mar 2024
#22
His proposal would apply to every single employer in the entire US in every sector.
MichMan
Mar 2024
#114
no - you hire enough resources to cover 1 extra day a week that allows all shifts to operate 4 days
Layzeebeaver
Mar 2024
#73
No, you stated that wasn't what I said, when it was a direct copy and paste from the post you replied to.
MichMan
Mar 2024
#111
Exactly, I worked in a steel mill for 40 years, the mill had to work 24/7 to show
doc03
Mar 2024
#33
I never said it was being proposed. My reply was in response to the post I quoted below.
MichMan
Mar 2024
#72
Yeah, Social Security and FDR's entire New Deal was naive and never attainable.
Hermit-The-Prog
Mar 2024
#65
You're dodging the question about how you plan to give everyone an extra day off
calguy
Mar 2024
#66
I didn't dodge a fucking thing. Excess profits for non-producing CEOs. See above.
Hermit-The-Prog
Mar 2024
#67
Well, lol just destroys all arguments for ending extreme wealth disparity.
Hermit-The-Prog
Mar 2024
#71
You may want to look again. Starbucks says their net revenue was $36 billion.
Hermit-The-Prog
Mar 2024
#88
You've jumped from net revenue to net income while ignoring gross profit.
Hermit-The-Prog
Mar 2024
#116
Do you not understand it's not for submission to the SEC? It's lounge time.
Hermit-The-Prog
Mar 2024
#137
Pass this proposal and you will see a lot of manufacturing get outsourced to Mexico, India and Asia
MichMan
Mar 2024
#40
nah it's the posters defending the interests of private industry that are cracking me up
WhiskeyGrinder
Mar 2024
#56
I missed the part in Sen Sanders bill where it stated it only applied to businesses owned by billionaires
MichMan
Mar 2024
#70
They wouldn't need to hire more people. Here's how it worked in the UK recently
progressoid
Mar 2024
#76
Explain how it works in manufacturing when production is dictated by machine cycle times?
MichMan
Mar 2024
#79
How are hairdressers, plumbers and auto mechanics more productive working 32 hours vs 40?
MichMan
Mar 2024
#106
He should operate his Senate office like this to demonstrate how well this will work
Jose Garcia
Mar 2024
#63
If he wants a living wage, just introduce legislation to increase the minimum wage
MichMan
Mar 2024
#121
So if I make 100 widgets a week@20 a day, now I'm supposed to make 25 a day?
oldsoftie
Mar 2024
#104