Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Judge Cannon is going to be removed from Smelvis' case [View all]Duncanpup
(15,651 posts)2. Your mom and her generation saved the world
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
18 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
57 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Kudos to your mother who was clearly a patriot. TFG who is running to lead this country would sell to the highest bidder
Rhiannon12866
Mar 2024
#4
Imagine my house, my wife was 28 years with CIA. I have clearances from my service. She will not ...
marble falls
Mar 2024
#52
My best buddy was in the Navy. He was posted to a nuclear sub.. When ever anything comes up about what he did
mitch96
Mar 2024
#56
"We've reached a point where I'm in over my head. What do you guys suggest?"
bucolic_frolic
Mar 2024
#6
She is clever like the donald, a little bit smarter than him, but very unwise (as unwise as he is)
Bernardo de La Paz
Mar 2024
#10
"Clarify" if only to clear out some defense nonsense, but since she is biased she bungled it. . . . nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Mar 2024
#19
traitortrump's loose cannon wants to be provided with an excuse to dismiss the case.
Hermit-The-Prog
Mar 2024
#13
Ben Meiselas: Jack Smith is being asked to engage with situations that violate the law
BeyondGeography
Mar 2024
#16
So the very act of Smith's even answering this is what, a trap? Moss says he should answer it.
ancianita
Mar 2024
#42
Okay, thank you. Do you think he will appeal to the 11th Circuit based on this Order? Because to me, it
ancianita
Mar 2024
#46
Me, too. This fits the standard of "egregious." In her case, mere rebuke by the 11th just won't work.
ancianita
Mar 2024
#51
It is the OP's conjecture. Doesn't have to be in the link. General Discussion is not LBN
Bernardo de La Paz
Mar 2024
#21
Clearly she's looking for delay delay delay. And throwing anything at the wall to do it.
FailureToCommunicate
Mar 2024
#36