Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Judge Cannon is going to be removed from Smelvis' case [View all]BeyondGeography
(41,107 posts)44. If his answer is she's at odds with the law they're on the same page
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
57 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Kudos to your mother who was clearly a patriot. TFG who is running to lead this country would sell to the highest bidder
Rhiannon12866
Mar 2024
#4
Imagine my house, my wife was 28 years with CIA. I have clearances from my service. She will not ...
marble falls
Mar 2024
#52
My best buddy was in the Navy. He was posted to a nuclear sub.. When ever anything comes up about what he did
mitch96
Mar 2024
#56
"We've reached a point where I'm in over my head. What do you guys suggest?"
bucolic_frolic
Mar 2024
#6
She is clever like the donald, a little bit smarter than him, but very unwise (as unwise as he is)
Bernardo de La Paz
Mar 2024
#10
"Clarify" if only to clear out some defense nonsense, but since she is biased she bungled it. . . . nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Mar 2024
#19
traitortrump's loose cannon wants to be provided with an excuse to dismiss the case.
Hermit-The-Prog
Mar 2024
#13
Ben Meiselas: Jack Smith is being asked to engage with situations that violate the law
BeyondGeography
Mar 2024
#16
So the very act of Smith's even answering this is what, a trap? Moss says he should answer it.
ancianita
Mar 2024
#42
Okay, thank you. Do you think he will appeal to the 11th Circuit based on this Order? Because to me, it
ancianita
Mar 2024
#46
Me, too. This fits the standard of "egregious." In her case, mere rebuke by the 11th just won't work.
ancianita
Mar 2024
#51
It is the OP's conjecture. Doesn't have to be in the link. General Discussion is not LBN
Bernardo de La Paz
Mar 2024
#21
Clearly she's looking for delay delay delay. And throwing anything at the wall to do it.
FailureToCommunicate
Mar 2024
#36