Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

bucolic_frolic

(55,919 posts)

1. So in this case they allow local officials or courts (not sure which) to make this decision

Reply to ificandream (Original post)

Tue Mar 19, 2024, 10:15 AM

Mar 2024

Kind of contradicts overruling Colorado Supreme Court in the Trump ballot decision, though he was only going to be on the ballot at that point, not be an officeholder.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

raging moderate

3 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Supreme Court Lets Public Office Ban Stand for 'Cowboys for Trump' Founder (New York Times) [View all] ificandream Mar 2024 OP

So in this case they allow local officials or courts (not sure which) to make this decision bucolic_frolic Mar 2024 #1

It doesn't contradict at all. Cuthbert Allgood Mar 2024 #2

Dramatic foreshadowing if IQ 45 finally found guilty for J-6? GreenWave Mar 2024 #3