Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Laura PourMeADrink

(42,770 posts)
43. here's some ideas
Sun Nov 25, 2012, 09:34 AM
Nov 2012

While waiting for Election Day results, here’s a reminder that 2016 is only four years away. A list of 10 Democrats who could be top presidential contenders next cycle.

1. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton
The popular secretary of State has said repeatedly that she has no plans to run for president again, and has hinted that she’d like to turn to advocacy work after she leaves her post next year. But Democrats—and even some Republicans—keep calling on Clinton to run, and after four successful years as the face of American diplomacy her fan base is deeper than ever. If Clinton were to throw her hat in the ring, she’d be considered the front-runner, just as she was when she launched her 2008 bid.

2. Vice President Joe Biden
Biden ran for president in 1988, plagiarized a speech, and had to withdraw. He ran again in 2008, landed a few noteworthy gaffes, and dropped out early in the primary process after struggling to make a mark. But he is a more instinctively populist politician than many of 2016’s potential contenders, and many Democrats love him despite his flaws.

3. Maryland Gov. Martin O’Malley
Speech at the Democratic convention: check. Outspoken defender of Obama: check. A Political Action Committee that will back nationwide candidates: check. The ambitious chairman of the Democratic Governors Association has left little doubt that he’s mulling a 2016 bid. O’Malley has a strong record in improving education, and he’s been a stalwart supporter of liberal causes such as same-sex marriage and immigration reform, including a Maryland version of the Dream Act.

4. New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo
The governor of New York isn’t kissing anyone’s shoes. Cuomo’s appearance at the Democratic convention was so fast and so low-profile that few even knew he was in town. In Albany, he hasn’t been afraid to anger the liberal base, particularly by clashing with unions, but he’s won widespread praise for his ability to wrangle legislators. Cuomo’s ability to cut a deal paid off with a big win for Democrats: legalization of gay marriage in New York.

5. Sen. Mark Warner of Virginia
Virginia’s junior senator isn’t a household name, but he’s been a key player in Washington’s deficit-reduction talks. As a member of the “Gang of Six” and the “Gang of Eight,” Warner has participated in secret negotiations aiemd at budgetary compromise. So far, the behind-the-scenes talks haven’t borne fruit, but if the gang’s discussions manage to push Congress toward a deal, it would be a gold star on Warner’s resume. He also has a strong business background and can point to his ability to win a Senate seat in a battleground state.

6. Montana Gov. Brian Schweitzer
The governor of Montana made a big splash at the 2008 Democratic convention, and he was back for a second time in 2012. Schweitzer is a big player in the Democratic Governors Association, a popular populist and the liberal governor of a conservative state. He is known for his showmanship—and his a sometimes outlandish sense of humor. Schweitzer has signaled that he’d be open to a presidential bid: At the recent party convention, he met with New Hampshire and Iowa delegates.

7. Massachusetts Gov. Deval Patrick
Patrick’s plum speaking role at the 2012 Democratic convention raised his profile and sparked speculation that he could be a contender in 2016. As an African-American with a rags-to-riches story, he inevitably draws comparisons to Obama, and he’s been a prominent surrogate for the president. Patrick has built a solidly liberal record as governor, focusing on issues such as health care, the environment, and education. When his term ends in 2014, Patrick has said he plans to return to the private sector.

8. Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand of New York
Gillibrand is somewhat overshadowed by other New York state politicians—notably Gov. Cuomo and her forerunner in the Senate, Hillary Rodham Clinton. Yet Gillibrand has star power, and she has proved to be a prolific fundraiser for both herself and other Democrats seeking office. Absent Clinton, there could be an opening for a female senator to jump into the fray. For now, however, Gillibrand seems focused on encouraging Clinton to consider another shot at the presidency.

9. Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa
Vaulting from mayor to the presidency is a long shot for any politician—even the mayor of the second largest city in the United States. Villaraigosa is one of the highest-profile Latino leaders in the Democratic Party, and he got more attention as chair of the Democratic convention this year. He has said that his eyes are on the governorship of California, not the presidency, after his mayoral term ends in 2013, but Villaraigosa has never been shy of the media spotlight, and you can expect to hear from him in 2016—even if he’s just endorsing someone else.

10. Newark Mayor Cory Booker
The crusading mayor of a run-down city has won accolades for his efforts to reform the public school system. Booker is known for heroics: He recently ran into a burning building to rescue an elderly neighbor. The African-American former Rhodes Scholar got himself into hot water with Democrats earlier this year, when he publicly criticized the Obama campaign’s attacks on GOP nominee Mitt Romney’s private-equity career. Booker quickly walked back the critique in a YouTube video for the Obama campaign. The mayor's political future looks bright, but he’s more of a 2020 contender than 2016: Challenging Gov. Chris Christie for New Jersey governor in 2013 could be a better next step.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

It takes a Clinton to defeat a Bush. Like 1992. graham4anything Nov 2012 #1
You're right... PennsylvaniaMatt Nov 2012 #3
No more Bushes, No more Clintons.....It's time to part with both those eras. marmar Nov 2012 #13
it would be nice if she could just be considered just Hillary Rodham graham4anything Nov 2012 #15
"she is her own person and much more to the left of him anyhow." marmar Nov 2012 #16
look for a brand new post I am going to make separate about this very subject graham4anything Nov 2012 #18
It is amazing anyone would want to even ascertain ceding anything back to the republicans at all. DonCoquixote Nov 2012 #52
If not Hillary, who? Who do you like out there? Laura PourMeADrink Nov 2012 #42
here's some ideas Laura PourMeADrink Nov 2012 #43
#7, 9, 10 for VP along with Julian Castro graham4anything Nov 2012 #45
Yes, the Mario Cuomo skeletons. But, AH, just think if he could write his son's speeches ! Laura PourMeADrink Nov 2012 #62
Just think if he could write HIllary's or for that matter any Democrat's speeches. graham4anything Nov 2012 #63
Although Obama did get elected, there are so many people that could have Laura PourMeADrink Nov 2012 #65
God, please no Tony the V MurrayDelph Nov 2012 #50
A Perot was more critical than a Clinton last time. TheKentuckian Dec 2012 #73
Time to start talking about CC Nov 2012 #2
And who made up that rule? And what about the Kennedy's? With the Clinton's we get a team. Michigan Alum Nov 2012 #33
Name one other Kennedy president liberalhistorian Nov 2012 #54
Both Teddy and RFK ran. Yes it was a long time ago. If they were still around and healthy would you Michigan Alum Nov 2012 #70
Get his crooked past up front now Submariner Nov 2012 #4
Political parties are looking more and more like evangelican churches - handing down the ownership. Zen Democrat Nov 2012 #5
I prefer to WIN WIN WIN WIN WIN. It takes a WINNER to get anything to move FORWARD!!! graham4anything Nov 2012 #8
Hillary and Jeb -- both the beginnings of a monarchy. JDPriestly Nov 2012 #14
What if that were the case years ago??? FDR , JFK, Bobby and Teddy never could have run. graham4anything Nov 2012 #17
Franklin Roosevelt was Teddy Roosevelt's FIFTH cousin. JDPriestly Nov 2012 #22
So you didn't like that JFK and RFK and Teddy were allowed to be in office? graham4anything Nov 2012 #24
A seat in the Senate, one of many, is fine. JDPriestly Nov 2012 #29
ooh, parsing to suit your personal dislike of Hillary here and adapt it to whom you do perhaps? graham4anything Nov 2012 #31
Hillary loses her temper too easily and lets it show. JDPriestly Nov 2012 #56
Warmth sounds like a code word Rush Limbaugh would use graham4anything Nov 2012 #59
I have warned. JDPriestly Nov 2012 #66
I think the tidbit of info revealed as a throwaway in the Eric Cantor story disqualifies Warren graham4anything Nov 2012 #69
You need to learn a bit of flexibility and stop being so black & white in your thinking. Michigan Alum Nov 2012 #34
The repubs put in a law saying only 2 terms after FDR had 4...it came back to bite them graham4anything Nov 2012 #36
My post wasn't in response to you but JD Priestly. Michigan Alum Nov 2012 #41
Hillary won't win if she runs. JDPriestly Nov 2012 #55
FDR was Teddy Roosevelt's FIFTH cousin. JDPriestly Nov 2012 #23
Your post is stretching the issue greatly. and is sexist and showing a big dislike of the SOS graham4anything Nov 2012 #30
Hillary could never win the presidency. JDPriestly Nov 2012 #57
As SOS, she is not legally allowed to run for office. Of course she needs off to mount a campaign graham4anything Nov 2012 #58
there are only two parties, so it doesn't matter who you put in there, one of HiPointDem Nov 2012 #27
then why are you on Democratic underground? There are plenty of 3rd party boards out there graham4anything Nov 2012 #32
you seem to be reading a lot into my post that's not there. bad habit. HiPointDem Nov 2012 #37
you said there still are only 2 parties and that means we are going backwards... graham4anything Nov 2012 #38
ralph nader, or any third party candidate, can't win. ergo, one of the two major candidates HiPointDem Nov 2012 #39
ok. I disagree. One will move forward(Hillary will be left of Bill), one will move back(Jeb) graham4anything Nov 2012 #40
Cause what this country REALLY needs is another BUSH! Drahthaardogs Nov 2012 #6
Nikki wouldn't say told ya about this, because it is just conjecture and chatter from Bluenorthwest Nov 2012 #7
You got that right. randome Nov 2012 #9
this told ya so was for all the posters who have said he wasn't even thinking of running graham4anything Nov 2012 #11
The only way he can be a credible candidate is to totally disavow his brother's entire tenure tularetom Nov 2012 #10
Not so...Jeb is going to run as a SANE republican after the extremists ruined the party graham4anything Nov 2012 #12
the guy who ruined florida is going to run as a sane republican? please. HiPointDem Nov 2012 #28
His participation in "taking" the Oval Office during Election 2000 Samantha Nov 2012 #20
Best to campaign FOR the democrat and win it that way. graham4anything Nov 2012 #21
Generally speaking, I agree with you Samantha Nov 2012 #47
We don't need anymore Bushes or Clintons spaulettea Nov 2012 #19
+1. no more family dynasties. HiPointDem Nov 2012 #26
Much as I adore both of them (Sanders & Warren) it's not feasible for them to win. Michigan Alum Nov 2012 #35
Well, realistically spaulettea Nov 2012 #53
please god no. HiPointDem Nov 2012 #25
I can't believe Aerows Nov 2012 #44
JEBtm is the one candidate that can unite all JCMach1 Nov 2012 #46
the funny part is, he is the one candidate who also can unite our party who hates the Bush's graham4anything Nov 2012 #49
Hillary and Deval Patrick would cream JCMach1 Nov 2012 #68
Huh. My advice to whoever he's fooling around with: change your name and leave town. aquart Nov 2012 #48
12 years of bushit is quite enough spanone Nov 2012 #51
The BFEE again? Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Nov 2012 #60
what pray tell is a beff again? graham4anything Nov 2012 #61
BFEE bush family evil empire. SammyWinstonJack Nov 2012 #64
Of course he is, that was the plan all along. apnu Nov 2012 #67
100% correct. Glad you see it. graham4anything Dec 2012 #71
I've been saying and posting this forever. And with his Latina wife? A no-brainer. WinkyDink Dec 2012 #72
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»as Nikki Finke would say ...»Reply #43