Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

intheflow

(30,189 posts)

4. Isn't the vague wording of "engage with"

Reply to Nevilledog (Original post)

Wed Mar 20, 2024, 04:36 PM

Mar 2024

coupled with the fact that both scenarios are lawless interpretations of the PRA reason enough for Smith to appeal? The scenarios are so specific it’s clear she’s trying to manipulate the case. IANAL but…

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

11 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Litman: Cannon's handling of Trump's classified records case just went from bad to horrible [View all] Nevilledog Mar 2024 OP

It's obvious that she is not fair and balance............................. Lovie777 Mar 2024 #1

She's just looking to get whacked again by the appeals court Bayard Mar 2024 #2

Ya know... 2naSalit Mar 2024 #3

So why don't they? Otherwise this could go on for ever. TheRickles Mar 2024 #5

Those are great questions... 2naSalit Mar 2024 #8

Isn't the vague wording of "engage with" intheflow Mar 2024 #4

Another great share! You're the best, ND! littlemissmartypants Mar 2024 #6

... Nevilledog Mar 2024 #9

She's something, that's for sure bluestarone Mar 2024 #7

K&R UTUSN Mar 2024 #10

Called the 11th circuit court vapor2 Mar 2024 #11