Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Think. Again.

(22,456 posts)

6. The amount of the judgement...

Reply to senseandsensibility (Reply #5)

Mon Mar 25, 2024, 02:48 PM

Mar 2024

...directly reflects the amount of the fraud he committed.

Anything less would be complicity on the part of the court.

They shouldn't just make up numbers they like.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

7 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

HE PUBLICLY STATED HE HAS MORE THAN ENOUGH CASH... [View all] Think. Again. Mar 2024 OP

He didn't state that in a court of law so it doesn't matter. LonePirate Mar 2024 #1

Yep. Twice. dalton99a Mar 2024 #2

And you believe him? TwilightZone Mar 2024 #3

Doesn't matter... Think. Again. Mar 2024 #4

In fact, Lisa Rubin on MSNBC senseandsensibility Mar 2024 #5

The amount of the judgement... Think. Again. Mar 2024 #6

It would not surprise me one bit. StarryNite Mar 2024 #7