Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

John2

(2,730 posts)
9. I
Sun Nov 25, 2012, 06:04 PM
Nov 2012

was listening to Peggy Noonan's rebuttal to Reverand Al about how hard would it be to raise rates on a family of four with a $250,000 income. If she gave that response to me, then I would respond to her this way:

1) the most important question I would want to know is how much she make? I'm assuming she makes well over that amount and I would like to know, how does she know a family making that much income would suffer? I would also ask her does she know how much families making less than that manage their budgets? I would further ask her if the things your Party want to cut would strain those families even more and how does she propose to replace those needs?


2) Does she actually know what the President is proposing? As I understand it, the President is not proposing raising taxes on families that make the first $250,000 dollars, but the rates go up after that amount. I also understand there are deductions for families with kids. So aren't you misrepresenting the proposal in the first place? It seems to me, your job as a talking head is to actually know the issues? That is the problem with media pundits, they are out of touch with the people they advocate harmful policies for, which seems to be more in favor of your class.

3) None of the Policies that you are advocating even affects you. Things like Social Security or Medicare because of your wealth. And even if we go over the fiscal cliff, I really doubt anybody in your class will be fired or lose a job. You are talking about people, that you have no clue about their lives and I even doubt you really know about the family that you are talking for? I'm pretty sure that I can take care of a family of four with that income. Of course I would not be the socialite, that you are. Take your own advice and get rid of your extra luxuries. I do not think the world will end if you lose your caviar.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Du rec. Nt xchrom Nov 2012 #1
K&R. Iggo Nov 2012 #2
Big K&R. nt valerief Nov 2012 #3
4. Corporations stopped paying HALF OF THEIR TAXES after the recession. NMDemDist2 Nov 2012 #4
Enlightening. silverweb Nov 2012 #5
Great Post,K&R,N/T! Rain Mcloud Nov 2012 #6
k&r bloomington-lib Nov 2012 #7
HUGE K & R !!! - Thank You !!! WillyT Nov 2012 #8
I John2 Nov 2012 #9
Right-On! Populist_Prole Nov 2012 #10
K&R. Each one is a shocker. That we are 4th in income inequality out of 150 countries. Overseas Nov 2012 #11
And of course, life in the truedelphi Nov 2012 #17
Kick. Dark n Stormy Knight Nov 2012 #12
6. Tax deductions for the rich could pay off 100 PERCENT of the deficit. bvar22 Nov 2012 #13
10. The American public paid about FOUR TRILLION DOLLARS to bail out the banks. Octafish Nov 2012 #14
According to the audit that Bernie Sanders demanded and got truedelphi Nov 2012 #16
The first one really ... LisaLynne Nov 2012 #15
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Discussion points the Eli...»Reply #9