Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Sale of Guns Soar Following Election [View all]PavePusher
(15,374 posts)73. Since you can't (or won't) define what you mean by "assault weapon", there's no way to discuss...
Last edited Mon Nov 26, 2012, 01:07 AM - Edit history (1)
what would make one suitable or unsuitable for any particular activity. See my post here: http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=1882634
And as a hint, what I'm betting you mean as "assault weapons" are not particularly large. They are generally smaller and lighter than "traditional" bolt-action rifles or any shotgun.
Edit:
Or two miles. I have also always wondered about that, too. Why would an ordinary person need a gun that can shoot really far?
Well, first define (yeah, that task again) what you mean by "really far". No-one shoots 2 miles with any intent (or hope) of hitting anything, even highly trained snipers.
But here are a few reasons for being able to shoot accurately at ranges of up to 1000 yards or more:
1. Competition shooting.
2. Long range hunting (very rare).
3. Long range defense (sounds a bit counter-intuitive, but it happens).
4. Long range attack (in case the ultimate purpose of the Second Amendment ever becomes neccesary {and pray it doesn't}).
Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
98 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Prices did come down by year 3 of Obama's first term, but no one considered it a burst bubble
aikoaiko
Nov 2012
#5
"Traditional hunting firearms are in normal supply and their prices have not doubled like the ones..
Ghost in the Machine
Nov 2012
#15
For me, personally, I just happen to enjoy shooting. I grew up around guns, was taught gun safety at
Ghost in the Machine
Nov 2012
#94
That is precisely what we should NOT want to see happening. There is no "gun bubble"...
slackmaster
Nov 2012
#92
Or a President of any color who said he'd like to reintroduce the AWB during a debate.
aikoaiko
Nov 2012
#6
Do you think its nuts to believe our President when he says he wants to reintroduce the AWB?
aikoaiko
Nov 2012
#9
"The M-14 was also a select fire battle rifle." Some were. Some weren't.
AnotherMcIntosh
Nov 2012
#68
There may not have been a select fire option on your M-14, but there was a select fire option on
AnotherMcIntosh
Nov 2012
#50
The M-14 did not have a 3-round burst option. If you had a full-auto option, you simply took
AnotherMcIntosh
Nov 2012
#52
Which of the following is an "assault weapon (and why) and which is a hunting rifle?
PavePusher
Nov 2012
#66
You've hunted all your life and "everyone has their own opinion"? My opinion is that experienced
AnotherMcIntosh
Nov 2012
#32
The "term 'bullets' was used in" an "NRA magazine"? Cartridges are cartridges. Bullets are bullets.
AnotherMcIntosh
Nov 2012
#43
Maybe you too could participate by not locking threads that criticize your gun fetish or whatever
Hoyt
Nov 2012
#69
When I lock a thread as host it is because a clear majority of hosts supported the lock
aikoaiko
Nov 2012
#76
If you would get over your defensiveness you might see that I am asking a sincere question here.
renie408
Nov 2012
#74
In some parts of lower Michigan, one can only hunt deer with a handgun or shotgun
Kaleva
Nov 2012
#75
Why do you think (as you are so clearly insinuating) that s/he has any criminal intent...
PavePusher
Nov 2012
#78
One would assume, given the name, that it is a weapon designed to 'assault'; as opposed
renie408
Nov 2012
#63
Since you can't (or won't) define what you mean by "assault weapon", there's no way to discuss...
PavePusher
Nov 2012
#73
The election is not the issue. In a few days we'll be seeing news reports of increased sales...
slackmaster
Nov 2012
#90