Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: 'Profoundly ahistorical': 4-star generals side with Jack Smith, tell Supreme Court Trump's immunity claims are 'assault' [View all]malaise
(275,388 posts)30. Agree
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
75 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
'Profoundly ahistorical': 4-star generals side with Jack Smith, tell Supreme Court Trump's immunity claims are 'assault' [View all]
malaise
Apr 2024
OP
The extreme six do not care. It's about protecting the trump party for them.
madinmaryland
Apr 2024
#5
It's sad this brain trust was compelled to write the amicus brief on the first place
Brother Buzz
Apr 2024
#8
If the USSC goes down the stupid path they've been offered, "sad" won't cover what remains of the nation.
jaxexpat
Apr 2024
#65
I'm betting that decorated retired admirals, generals or secretaries from branches of the
aggiesal
Apr 2024
#17
Unfortunately the Roberts Court is only concerned about ushering in Christian Nationalism -
TBF
Apr 2024
#23
It's simple, Trump violated the Constitution by trying to overthrow the governmand and that voided his immunity.
cstanleytech
Apr 2024
#24
Oh, a President has some but it's very limited as the Republicans taught us with President Clinton.
cstanleytech
Apr 2024
#26
I'd be glad for some time where he was safe behind bars or in a padded room
struggle4progress
Apr 2024
#41