Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: 'Profoundly ahistorical': 4-star generals side with Jack Smith, tell Supreme Court Trump's immunity claims are 'assault' [View all]LiberaBlueDem
(975 posts)45. President can be impeached
SCOTUS needs to only be reminded of that to tell them there is no immunity
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
75 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
'Profoundly ahistorical': 4-star generals side with Jack Smith, tell Supreme Court Trump's immunity claims are 'assault' [View all]
malaise
Apr 8
OP
It's sad this brain trust was compelled to write the amicus brief on the first place
Brother Buzz
Apr 8
#8
If the USSC goes down the stupid path they've been offered, "sad" won't cover what remains of the nation.
jaxexpat
Apr 9
#65
I'm betting that decorated retired admirals, generals or secretaries from branches of the
aggiesal
Apr 8
#17
Unfortunately the Roberts Court is only concerned about ushering in Christian Nationalism -
TBF
Apr 8
#23
It's simple, Trump violated the Constitution by trying to overthrow the governmand and that voided his immunity.
cstanleytech
Apr 8
#24
Oh, a President has some but it's very limited as the Republicans taught us with President Clinton.
cstanleytech
Apr 8
#26
I'd be glad for some time where he was safe behind bars or in a padded room
struggle4progress
Apr 8
#41