Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bvar22

(39,909 posts)
41. It is NO myth...
Mon Nov 26, 2012, 04:01 PM
Nov 2012

...that FICA Contributions have been reduced by the Obama Administration under the guise of a "Temporary Payroll tax Holiday".

It is also no myth that Bush-the-Lesser accomplished the exact same stimulus without a Payroll tax Holiday by simply sending everybody a check from the General Fund.

It is also NO myth that the "Temporary Payroll Tax Holiday" contained legislation stipulating that shortfalls due the lowered collection of FICA contributions WILL BE RECOVERED from the General Fund.


"To prevent Social Security from losing tax revenue, Congress mandated that revenues be transferred from the general fund to the Social Security trust funds to make up for the tax reduction. "

http://taxes.about.com/od/payroll/a/Reduced-Social-Security-Withholding-For-2011.htm


It is also no myth that this has never been done before.
The "Payroll Tax Holiday" established a precedent.

Is also no myth that The Republicans could have NEVER accomplished this feat.
It required a Democrat to touch and ground The 3rd Rail.

It is no myth that once a precedent is established,
it is much easier to accomplish the next time.

The above are simple FACTS, not myths.
You can weasel & worm, distort & evade, twist & torture as much as you want to, but you can not deny the above facts.





You will know them by their WORKS,
not by their rhetoric, promises, or excuses.
[font size=5 color=firebrick]Solidarity99![/font][font size=2 color=green]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------[/center]

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

This is what many saw ... 1StrongBlackMan Nov 2012 #1
This John2 Nov 2012 #11
I wouldn't say ... 1StrongBlackMan Nov 2012 #16
Yup, I picked up on that too. Jackpine Radical Nov 2012 #53
VERY well stated! & Precisely right, there were those here, who when we lost the decision against patrice Nov 2012 #12
This. mac56 Nov 2012 #24
+1 nt ProudProgressiveNow Nov 2012 #28
We have our own JNelson6563 Nov 2012 #33
Falsely implying that Democrats with whom you disagree of being disloyal is a McCarthy tactic. AnotherMcIntosh Nov 2012 #51
lolz JNelson6563 Nov 2012 #59
There is no fiscal cliff leftstreet Nov 2012 #2
Thank-you. robinlynne Nov 2012 #4
Exactly. He should reject the term. Call their bluff, then start from sabrina 1 Nov 2012 #7
Agreed, strongly agreed! PO should publicly reject "fiscal cliff" & so should we! nt patrice Nov 2012 #14
It's a tactical marketing decision BlueCaliDem Nov 2012 #19
Bingo ... 1StrongBlackMan Nov 2012 #23
Wrong. They deny the truth about marketing leftstreet Nov 2012 #34
You're kidding, right? Or, are you ... 1StrongBlackMan Nov 2012 #43
No Dem will have his political capital again in our lifetimes leftstreet Nov 2012 #49
Sloganism ... 1StrongBlackMan Nov 2012 #57
Because Democrats staged healthcare 'town halls' leftstreet Nov 2012 #64
Okay ... 1StrongBlackMan Nov 2012 #68
He could have done all those things?? Really? BlueCaliDem Nov 2012 #45
Yes. Those are the reasons people elected him leftstreet Nov 2012 #50
He got it because of 9/11, and cowed Congress with the political capital BlueCaliDem Nov 2012 #52
No ... 1StrongBlackMan Nov 2012 #58
The difference is ... 1StrongBlackMan Nov 2012 #20
Heretic. Jakes Progress Nov 2012 #25
so caving isn't really caving hfojvt Nov 2012 #3
That'll show 'em. cliffordu Nov 2012 #5
no, it won't be any more hfojvt Nov 2012 #9
The pre-cave cave, but it being from Mother Jones is unfathomable. I too plethoro Nov 2012 #6
I strongly disagree with Corn. bvar22 Nov 2012 #8
MYTHS AND MISINFORMATION ABOUT SOCIAL SECURITY- Part 2 pinto Nov 2012 #29
It is NO myth... bvar22 Nov 2012 #41
Ah geez. I didn't "weasel & worm, distort & evade, twist & torture". I simply reposted SSA statement pinto Nov 2012 #44
So then you agree with every fact I stated in the above post. bvar22 Nov 2012 #47
This message was self-deleted by its author bvar22 Nov 2012 #48
Same facts, different characterization zipplewrath Nov 2012 #10
If Republicans get away with the deductions lie, Agnosticsherbet Nov 2012 #13
+1 forestpath Nov 2012 #17
Yup. Sounds like spin to me. joeunderdog Nov 2012 #56
there is good reason to think he will NOT cave this time (on tax cuts) Enrique Nov 2012 #15
I don't John2 Nov 2012 #22
they are openly talking about the Medicare eligibility age Enrique Nov 2012 #31
It's a 'fiscal bluff', R's are terrified to cut the bloated war budget.... grahamhgreen Nov 2012 #18
'Fiscal Bluff'. I like that better. It is more honest. sabrina 1 Nov 2012 #27
Agreed. This Congress needs to keep their phuking mitts off of Social Security AND Medicare! nt patrice Nov 2012 #36
I like "Bluff" because a bluff is not only a cliff, but a deception, and it resembles grahamhgreen Nov 2012 #42
Yes, it is a great play on the word 'cliff', lol! Related geographically, but sabrina 1 Nov 2012 #55
We had better think long and hard on this subject... kentuck Nov 2012 #21
the "white flag" has already been waved before negotiations have started. snooze nt msongs Nov 2012 #26
FIGHT Congress!!! -> contact info: patrice Nov 2012 #30
Obama could not let them expire last time because that would have rasied takes on those JoePhilly Nov 2012 #32
My case for letting the Bush Tax Cuts end, it ALL depends upon what we get for it: patrice Nov 2012 #35
Of course, that's what happened. Thanks JoePhilly That's exactly what would Cha Nov 2012 #37
+1,000 to what you said. freshwest Nov 2012 #61
Actually Joe. In the last election, the President said that he would let ALL taxes increase bluestate10 Nov 2012 #39
Yup ... I was describing the promises he made in 2008 ... JoePhilly Nov 2012 #46
I favor Warren Buffet's plan. bluestate10 Nov 2012 #38
Matthew Iglesias calls it a "Triumph" .. Cha Nov 2012 #40
Thanks for that one. freshwest Nov 2012 #62
Sure! :) Cha Nov 2012 #63
It was, but not ProSense Nov 2012 #65
I saw the stupid last night Cha Nov 2012 #69
Geez....are they ALL IN ON IT?!?! I am still stunned after seeing a clip of David Plouffe on forestpath Nov 2012 #54
K & R freshwest Nov 2012 #60
Democrats have been putting up a united front. ProSense Nov 2012 #66
I think the only difference between getting to his intended goal now or later is lunatica Nov 2012 #67
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»OBAMA's Trojan Horse - No...»Reply #41