Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

unblock

(55,853 posts)
11. They can probably argue that it's a legitimate campaign expense
Fri Apr 12, 2024, 12:37 AM
Apr 2024

The campaign benefits from Donnie getting a good result in court, and the campaign is in trouble if Donnie gets a bad result in court. So it's probably a legitimate campaign expense even though Donnie benefits personally and would have had to pay as an individual if he didn't have a campaign to suck funds from.

CEOs benefit personally from many corporate expenses, such as travel (they love spending a week for brief meetings or "conferences" in places like Turks and Caicos or Hawaii) or limo services. High profile CEOs can probably justify home security and bodyguards.

Btw, gift tax probably doesn't apply to any of this, but if it did, it's the donor who pays gift tax, but the recipient.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Question - Shouldn't This...»Reply #11