Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

moniss

(4,587 posts)
5. I'm thinking that some of the
Fri Apr 12, 2024, 12:34 PM
Apr 2024

countries considering recognition now are thinking strategically about how to make an "international" presence easier to happen as a counter to those you mention. Right now the situation in the West Bank needs a major reboot because it is not sustainable like this for much longer with the groups you mentioned seeming to exert an increasing influence. A couple of months ago I pointed out that the UN strategy for maintaining force "zones" in the Sinai has for the most part worked well. Maybe the "international" presence could occur concurrently with statehood recognition based on the 1967 borders. I would note that the PA has said that they are willing to negotiate regarding borders but only after the international community, meaning the UN, adheres to their already adopted resolutions regarding borders. They have said this in the context of resolving the other issues like compensation, right of return, natural resources etc.

But obviously all of this needs to happen when the voice of the Palestinians themselves is freely heard regarding leadership. Once they express it, but only if judged to have been freely expressed, then the world should accept that leadership as speaking for the Palestinians even if we in the West etc. may not agree with all positions taken by that leadership. We of course would not accept a continuation of violence but as far as a border line being moved here or there or an exchange of resources for other items like compensation or right of return then we should respect that expression and not "take sides".

After they have had presidential elections ripcord Apr 2024 #1
I'm wondering if moniss Apr 2024 #3
Ah settler ethics. Voltaire2 Apr 2024 #6
I'd rather them be their own country. jimfields33 Apr 2024 #8
That's what I say. LeftInTX Apr 2024 #18
Yep. Absolutely. jimfields33 Apr 2024 #22
Who speaks for the State of Palestine-- Hamas, Hezbollah, the Palestinian Authority...? dutch777 Apr 2024 #2
I'm thinking that some of the moniss Apr 2024 #5
Don't know if it is possible, but key will be making Israel feel safe & the true free will of the Palestinians in a... dutch777 Apr 2024 #24
That would be their problem. Voltaire2 Apr 2024 #7
Whoever recognizes a Palestinian state, should be aware that Beastly Boy Apr 2024 #4
As I mentioned in some other responses moniss Apr 2024 #10
As things stand now, I believe Israel is on board with international peacekeeping force in Gaza, Beastly Boy Apr 2024 #16
I agree with what should have been taking place but here moniss Apr 2024 #23
Too many people have illusions about what "international protection forces" do... brooklynite Apr 2024 #9
That is precisely why they are needed moniss Apr 2024 #11
So if there are UN forces on the Gaza border, there won't be any Hamas attacks? brooklynite Apr 2024 #12
Yeah, that isn't working out too well in Lebanon. Ace Rothstein Apr 2024 #13
The UN forces moniss Apr 2024 #15
My comment is about moniss Apr 2024 #14
It was tabled by the UNSC yesterday LeftInTX Apr 2024 #17
Yes I know but the move by independent countries to give recognition moniss Apr 2024 #19
It is up to the United States and we have total veto power. LeftInTX Apr 2024 #20
That was my point moniss Apr 2024 #21
It is a one state reality in which millions lack voting rights. David__77 Apr 2024 #25
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Pressure is building for ...»Reply #5