Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: New CA bill would limit the speed of all vehicles to 10 MPH over the speed limit [View all]Happy Hoosier
(9,498 posts)161. Yeah, thanks... Those are not even remotely comprable claims.
My claim is simple: I think there are times where speeding is justified. The fact that you'd be willing to sacrifice my ability to do what I did in the name of statistics is not of any interest to me.
If my Dad had died that day, it would have been of no comfort that statistically it was probably better.
Yes, that's an emotional response. Human's are emotional animals. We must consider those basic emootions in our calculations and risk assessments. We could all be much safer if we limited highway speeds to 30 mph. Do you see any circumstance where people would tolerate that?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
216 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
New CA bill would limit the speed of all vehicles to 10 MPH over the speed limit [View all]
Hope232
Apr 2024
OP
Are you saying it's your business if you break the maximum speed limit by more than ten mph? Your business if you break
Doodley
Apr 2024
#97
I've read it, thank you. I see nowhere that it talks about speed-restructing vehicals.
Doodley
Apr 2024
#156
It's impossible to drive at the posted speed limit where speed bumps are present...
Hugin
Apr 2024
#36
Punishing everyone who wants to drive way beyonf the speed limit and endanger others? Really?
Doodley
Apr 2024
#101
I lived in England. I was allowed to ride a motorcyle at age 16, that's a year earlier than you can drive a car.
Doodley
Apr 2024
#153
Seems to me a 10-over governor will work about as well as the so-called self-driving cars...
brush
Apr 2024
#185
The legislator is well-intentioned but one wonders if he's ever driven a car before...
brush
Apr 2024
#189
The buyer pays for it because the cost will be passed on as part of the total cost of the car
zeusdogmom
Apr 2024
#67
The maximum speed present on a speedometer has nothing to do with the top speed of the car.
MichMan
Apr 2024
#210
I won't call him a nut case, but I do think the proposal is utterly foolish.
Happy Hoosier
Apr 2024
#166
"If a child's life is saved by this device... saving lives no matter the cost"
EX500rider
Apr 2024
#169
130 horsepower? That's rather excessive, isn't it? Who needs that much power?
mahatmakanejeeves
Apr 2024
#62
What makes you unique? If we allow you to make that choice, shouldn't we allow others to make that choice too? NT
mahatmakanejeeves
Apr 2024
#122
I can't imagine the residents of California tolerating this. It's a super bad move for whoever champions it.
patphil
Apr 2024
#17
This outrage reminds me of anti-masking? As you say, it's to save lives. Nobody should be speeding anyway.
Doodley
Apr 2024
#102
I am glad it worked out for your dad. Google: smoking saved my life. Google: Seatbelt victims. Google: Covid shot death
Doodley
Apr 2024
#145
As I said, I am very pleased your dad made it. I don't see any human life as a statistic. Do you have anything you would
Doodley
Apr 2024
#174
If DU awarded a prize for "least self-aware post of the day," I'm sure that one would win it.
mahatmakanejeeves
Apr 2024
#131
Apologies - when you posted this in General Discussion, I didn't realize you intended it to be a CA only discussion.
CincyDem
Apr 2024
#64
We'll see if he can convince other Democrats to commit electoral suicide.
Happy Hoosier
Apr 2024
#121
No thanks.. I have needed to go beyond that to prevent serious accidents...
Chakaconcarne
Apr 2024
#74
This is playing right into the hands of the RW attempts to universalise the false slur that all Dems are nanny staters
Celerity
Apr 2024
#113
God forbid I have enough time to change lanes for my exit before someone going 100 mph creams me passing on the right.
NoSheep
Apr 2024
#115
You could name the Bill... "Democrats never win another election again act of 2024"
WarGamer
Apr 2024
#119
This outrage reminds me of the fight against smoking laws, gun laws, seatbelt laws, motorbike helmet laws.
Doodley
Apr 2024
#164
This is a terrible idea and not mainly because of civil liberties. It's terrible because it won't work.
localroger
Apr 2024
#181
Hahahaha. Terrific one-liner. I first heard it from my introductory chemistry instructor.
mahatmakanejeeves
Apr 2024
#206
Nearly everyone sized up the OP right away as a plant. It looked like one of James O'Keefe's less successful new hires.
mahatmakanejeeves
Apr 2024
#202
Unless the CA is going to provide free internet access for all vehicles made after 2026, this is not going to end well
krawhitham
Apr 2024
#208