Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Silent3

(15,909 posts)
17. Please note too that I have done you the courtesy...
Wed Apr 17, 2024, 10:55 PM
Apr 2024

...of clearly and directly addressing every "hoop" you have attempted to create. I have no need to duck and swerve and act as if your arguments and counterarguments are traps.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Probably comes down to name recognition. Pretty Fly Apr 2024 #1
Kennedy announced in the past few days that he is not interested DemocraticPatriot Apr 2024 #24
He must feel confident he'll get on state ballots then. Pretty Fly Apr 2024 #25
So far he is 'officially' on ONE-- Utah---- with claims to be DemocraticPatriot Apr 2024 #36
It all depends on... Think. Again. Apr 2024 #2
While there are some deliberately biased polsters, it's ridiculously conspiratorial to imagine all or most... Silent3 Apr 2024 #4
There's a lot at stake, and big money involved... Think. Again. Apr 2024 #5
Show me the investigative reporting of the payoffs Silent3 Apr 2024 #6
Speaking of teaching statistics,.... Think. Again. Apr 2024 #7
What does that have to do with justifying a conspiratorial view of the majority of polling? Silent3 Apr 2024 #9
Well, is it really just a conspiratorial view if... Think. Again. Apr 2024 #10
All I am trusting is this couldn't be wide-spread without *something* tangible leaking out... Silent3 Apr 2024 #12
Uh-huh.... Think. Again. Apr 2024 #13
Show me the collection of articles that say that their is *widespread*, deliberate manipulation... Silent3 Apr 2024 #14
I have not jumped through your hoops, correct. Think. Again. Apr 2024 #15
That's an intellectually dishonest rhetorical technique Silent3 Apr 2024 #16
Please note too that I have done you the courtesy... Silent3 Apr 2024 #17
mmmm.... Think. Again. Apr 2024 #18
But you're tacitly admitting that you don't know how to defend that position. Silent3 Apr 2024 #19
You're just gaslighting me now. Think. Again. Apr 2024 #23
I think you don't understand what "gaslighting" means Silent3 Apr 2024 #32
Just keep walking AZSkiffyGeek Apr 2024 #29
Do post the pages where this eminent textbook NanaCat Apr 2024 #21
You've completely missed my point. Think. Again. Apr 2024 #22
I've taken statistics at two different schools PoindexterOglethorpe Apr 2024 #28
You're in the minority. Think. Again. Apr 2024 #34
Why do I doubt that? PoindexterOglethorpe Apr 2024 #37
Because they're lying with statistics? NT AZSkiffyGeek Apr 2024 #39
Maybe you should do a poll of people who've studied statistics... Think. Again. Apr 2024 #40
They need to name a candidate womanofthehills Apr 2024 #3
+1 H2O Man Apr 2024 #11
They don't have a candidate yet. Their nominating convention isn't until May. brooklynite Apr 2024 #8
They don't have a nominee yet Polybius Apr 2024 #20
Because they only care about their own interests bucolic_frolic Apr 2024 #26
Have you MET Libertarians? ismnotwasm Apr 2024 #27
They have the luxury of never having to back up their zany claims Orrex Apr 2024 #31
Yup ismnotwasm Apr 2024 #33
Because "Libertarian" is a less polite term for "asshole" Orrex Apr 2024 #30
Not true. They are always nice when I check out and return books. Wonder Why Apr 2024 #35
You're a bad person for posting that. Orrex Apr 2024 #41
The Libertarian party still has nine viable candidates in the running for the party's presidential nomination. LudwigPastorius Apr 2024 #38
They're falling apart, being raided by the right wing GenThePerservering Apr 2024 #42
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why aren't Libertarians i...»Reply #17