Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

PufPuf23

(9,130 posts)

10. It is often said that the MSM has a liberal bias.

Reply to Silent Type (Reply #1)

Sat Apr 20, 2024, 10:12 PM

Apr 2024

IMHO a rational way to look at MSM is ownership.

Hard to have confidence given the level of gaslighting most Americans (and humans) experience.

Credentials don't mean as much as in the past; probably a goal of some social engineers.

So much goes or could go wrong.

I am tired.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

41 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

I have grave concern about Juror #2 [View all] edhopper Apr 2024 OP

According to many here, NYT, WP, CNN, MSNBC, WSJ are right wing. So jury looks stacked. Silent Type Apr 2024 #1

It is often said that the MSM has a liberal bias. PufPuf23 Apr 2024 #10

I agree this is a nightmare. Eliot Rosewater Apr 2024 #2

Maybe someone can tell the jurors whatever someone told johnson Marthe48 Apr 2024 #3

Unfuckingbelievable gab13by13 Apr 2024 #4

I trust the prosecutors to know what they're doing. nt MarineCombatEngineer Apr 2024 #5

I am with you on this. nt sheshe2 Apr 2024 #12

Im not as jury savvy as you all are, but this sort of jury speculation is not right. Srkdqltr Apr 2024 #6

Number 5 looks just as bad FakeNoose Apr 2024 #7

Google News is pretty placid really underpants Apr 2024 #29

Narcissists are fragile and easily swayed bucolic_frolic Apr 2024 #8

This can't be real. They released the questionnaire to the public a week ago, but not the completed ones. Westcoast4life Apr 2024 #9

Trump will be convicted Mark.b2 Apr 2024 #11

And juror #4? No news at all? Easterncedar Apr 2024 #13

His profile on NBC says he's a security engineer.... Mark.b2 Apr 2024 #14

so maybe he gets his news from Ars Technica? DBoon Apr 2024 #15

If he reads Ars Technica, thats a very good thing.... Mark.b2 Apr 2024 #16

He's not an engineer mahina Apr 2024 #23

Reminds me: It is no longer the 'cleaning lady" but "Enviromental services" riversedge Apr 2024 #32

I am surrounded by T supporters and this fellow could be one of my neighbors. Tumbulu Apr 2024 #24

He may be someone who has their world as they want it. underpants Apr 2024 #27

The prosecution doesn't have unlimited numbers of challenges TexasDem69 Apr 2024 #17

My understanding is that juror 2 chowder66 Apr 2024 #18

How many of you that are posting Tree Lady Apr 2024 #19

Thanks for calming me down Tumbulu Apr 2024 #25

I was called for jury duty twice in the city of Richmond underpants Apr 2024 #26

What is the source of this chart? Ohio Joe Apr 2024 #20

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/04/19/nyregion/trump-trial-jury-news.html John Farmer Apr 2024 #21

Either post a proper response or a non paying site...this is not accesible without a subscription. Demsrule86 Apr 2024 #41

NYT edhopper Apr 2024 #22

Seriously, how was that juror allowed on the jury? Initech Apr 2024 #28

This might help a little Bleacher Creature Apr 2024 #30

Thank you for that edhopper Apr 2024 #34

Talk radio is notably missing from options. Very influential. I listen to it. underpants Apr 2024 #31

I think there is a very slim chance Trump is convicted. nt doc03 Apr 2024 #33

#1 is a far greater concern NanaCat Apr 2024 #35

And MSNBC edhopper Apr 2024 #36

I understand and tend to agree but PCIntern Apr 2024 #37

Sure edhopper Apr 2024 #38

40% of American voters are Trump supporters, what is the odds of not getting one on the jury? Chainfire Apr 2024 #39

In Manhattan edhopper Apr 2024 #40