Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

dlk

(12,141 posts)
24. To justice Alito: Killing women should be restricted
Wed Apr 24, 2024, 03:49 PM
Apr 2024

Surely he’s not that dumb. He must have a very deep-seated hatred of women. What is wrong with him would take up more space than is available to write in.

Good malaise Apr 2024 #1
From your lips senseandsensibility Apr 2024 #2
Well, if hospitals won't observe basic federal laws to provide needed care, Attilatheblond Apr 2024 #3
In Idaho, all you need is a knife, a bullet to bit on, and lots of whisky. erronis Apr 2024 #30
I like the S. Korean 4B Movement -- no dating, no sex, no marriage, no kids. OMGWTF Apr 2024 #31
Amen. TSExile Apr 2024 #56
There's an idea. Captain Zero Apr 2024 #63
Alito said what? LiberalFighter Apr 2024 #4
Well, the Sinister Six may be looking at extraordinary rendition Aviation Pro Apr 2024 #5
If they decide the orange has total immunity BlueKota Apr 2024 #10
If they aren't willing to take the gloves off, then who will be responsible for the loss of our Democracy? usaf-vet Apr 2024 #45
Good question BlueKota Apr 2024 #55
Some of those six justices would be at risk. LiberalFighter Apr 2024 #28
Absolutely ALEC has been more visable with their actions. But the Federalist Society is the ones teeing up SCOTUS seats. usaf-vet Apr 2024 #46
He said hes never heard of the Supremacy Clause. Volaris Apr 2024 #18
Apparently he has never heard of the Hippocratic Oath that all doctors take either. pazzyanne Apr 2024 #65
It would seem that the Dr.'s DENVERPOPS Apr 2024 #67
even without immunity Traurigkeit Apr 2024 #32
No kidding.. mountain grammy Apr 2024 #38
Six shit heads misogynists BlueKota Apr 2024 #6
The woman is indeed a misogynist Aviation Pro Apr 2024 #8
She's a card-carrying handmaiden. dchill Apr 2024 #34
"How can you impose restrictions on what Idaho can criminalize?" 0rganism Apr 2024 #7
To me the worst thing was when he asked the Idaho guy TxGuitar Apr 2024 #12
So...Idaho can criminalize paying federal taxes? n/t forgotmylogin Apr 2024 #25
What if Idaho decides that Supreme Court rulings do not apply to Idaho? LakeVermilion Apr 2024 #52
More women and those who love us will suffer if so, mahina Apr 2024 #9
Does alito think Idaho could criminalize black people voting? unblock Apr 2024 #11
Republicans used to be against judicial activism. They seem to love it when it benefits their own desires. keithbvadu2 Apr 2024 #13
They Were NEVER Against Judicial Activism ProfessorGAC Apr 2024 #15
Aye! keithbvadu2 Apr 2024 #17
Just wait. They'll tank the abortion pill, too. The only way women in this country will be guaranteed Vinca Apr 2024 #14
I may be nave, but I thought Barrett and yorkster Apr 2024 #16
I haven't heard what Kavanaugh said, but I agree that Barrett sounded quite skeptical. ShazzieB Apr 2024 #36
I admit her remarks surprised me. n/t pazzyanne Apr 2024 #59
Since when did state laws Blue Idaho Apr 2024 #19
Primary school lesson WOLFMAN87 Apr 2024 #37
Welcome to DU! Wednesdays Apr 2024 #70
Welcome to DU LetMyPeopleVote Apr 2024 #74
The Subversive Court does not care about law, logic, or consequences, only their extreme ideology. Hermit-The-Prog Apr 2024 #20
so it appears.. mountain grammy Apr 2024 #40
It's absurd. The purpose of federal law cannot be increased risk of death. bucolic_frolic Apr 2024 #21
"How can you impose restrictions on what Idaho can criminalize?" Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. asked the solicitor general 3825-87867 Apr 2024 #22
Stand your ground doesnt remove the reasonable person standard for self defense. DetroitLegalBeagle Apr 2024 #39
Term limit the SCOTUS Dan Apr 2024 #23
13 Justices and 10 years MAX. Seeing most justices get on board about late mid 50s/late 60s so that'll let them be Traurigkeit Apr 2024 #33
Term limits would require an Amendment DetroitLegalBeagle Apr 2024 #41
Expect a huge fight over expansion, though. Wednesdays Apr 2024 #71
To justice Alito: Killing women should be restricted dlk Apr 2024 #24
WaPo gift article irisblue Apr 2024 #26
The Supremacy Clause is the cornerstone of federal authority. Have the hateful Six forgotten that bit of Federal trivia. Ford_Prefect Apr 2024 #27
Just for asking such a stupid question.... ShazzieB Apr 2024 #29
Stealing this malaise Apr 2024 #57
Please help yourself! ShazzieB Apr 2024 #72
Plrase, feel free! ShazzieB Apr 2024 #73
I don't ForgedCrank Apr 2024 #35
Sick six Demovictory9 Apr 2024 #42
How can a state be allowed to criminalize protecting a woman's life? pnwmom Apr 2024 #43
"The Sinister Six" I like it! LiberalLovinLug Apr 2024 #44
From all the keyboards Faux pas Apr 2024 #47
How selective! AncientOfDays Apr 2024 #48
Think about what power Alito is willing to grant states. sinkingfeeling Apr 2024 #49
What if Idaho want to criminalize voting? Captain Zero Apr 2024 #64
Alito is basically saying "Fuck the Constitution" nakocal Apr 2024 #50
Wait till it happens to one of the sinister six's ecstatic Apr 2024 #51
It NEVER will maxrandb Apr 2024 #53
THIS. TSExile Apr 2024 #58
Thoughts on Federal vs States rights and the Constitution LTG Apr 2024 #54
U.S. has a long history of MissMillie Apr 2024 #60
They make me very nervous. Passages Apr 2024 #61
This horrible Court was brought to us by UpInArms Apr 2024 #62
This court is SADISTIC, not supreme Zilli Apr 2024 #66
Even with this SCOTUS, we get a landslide in our favor ONLY Wednesdays Apr 2024 #68
This will hurt. Eyeball_Kid Apr 2024 #69
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Supreme Court's Sinister ...»Reply #24