Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Supreme Court's Sinister Six appears to shoot themselves in their collective feet and guarantee a Democratic landslide [View all]
erronis
(24,051 posts)30. In Idaho, all you need is a knife, a bullet to bit on, and lots of whisky.
Anything can be done. And if it can't, it shouldn't.
Hate to think of the impact that losing federal funding would have on the poor and aged and young. Just leaving the rugged middle-aged men - who can go fuck each other.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
6 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
74 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Supreme Court's Sinister Six appears to shoot themselves in their collective feet and guarantee a Democratic landslide [View all]
Aviation Pro
Apr 2024
OP
Well, if hospitals won't observe basic federal laws to provide needed care,
Attilatheblond
Apr 2024
#3
If they aren't willing to take the gloves off, then who will be responsible for the loss of our Democracy?
usaf-vet
Apr 2024
#45
Absolutely ALEC has been more visable with their actions. But the Federalist Society is the ones teeing up SCOTUS seats.
usaf-vet
Apr 2024
#46
Apparently he has never heard of the Hippocratic Oath that all doctors take either.
pazzyanne
Apr 2024
#65
Republicans used to be against judicial activism. They seem to love it when it benefits their own desires.
keithbvadu2
Apr 2024
#13
Just wait. They'll tank the abortion pill, too. The only way women in this country will be guaranteed
Vinca
Apr 2024
#14
I haven't heard what Kavanaugh said, but I agree that Barrett sounded quite skeptical.
ShazzieB
Apr 2024
#36
The Subversive Court does not care about law, logic, or consequences, only their extreme ideology.
Hermit-The-Prog
Apr 2024
#20
It's absurd. The purpose of federal law cannot be increased risk of death.
bucolic_frolic
Apr 2024
#21
"How can you impose restrictions on what Idaho can criminalize?" Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. asked the solicitor general
3825-87867
Apr 2024
#22
Stand your ground doesnt remove the reasonable person standard for self defense.
DetroitLegalBeagle
Apr 2024
#39
13 Justices and 10 years MAX. Seeing most justices get on board about late mid 50s/late 60s so that'll let them be
Traurigkeit
Apr 2024
#33