Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

D23MIURG23

(3,138 posts)

39. Because Garland is a coward. n/t

Reply to gab13by13 (Original post)

Wed Apr 24, 2024, 10:55 PM

Apr 2024

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

39 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Why Didn't Merrick Garland Prosecute "Individual One." [View all] gab13by13 Apr 2024 OP

I'm sure someone was whispering in his ear trying to avoid the look of political retribution. Fla Dem Apr 2024 #1

Doubtful it was the wh..... getagrip_already Apr 2024 #2

Garland seems to... Think. Again. Apr 2024 #3

Every AG and US attorney does that, selective prosecution is not unique to Garland. Nt Fiendish Thingy Apr 2024 #5

No, not every AG chooses what they personally want to prosecute. Think. Again. Apr 2024 #14

Who said anything about personally? Fiendish Thingy Apr 2024 #15

There is A journalist on Nicolle now gab13by13 Apr 2024 #18

Well, then it must be true. Nt Fiendish Thingy Apr 2024 #19

The Germans do have some experience with this sort of thing. Marcuse Apr 2024 #36

Laws are different in Germany & other EU countries. CaptainTruth Apr 2024 #26

Yeah, that was obviously not what I meant... Think. Again. Apr 2024 #20

Or he is a coward chicoescuela Apr 2024 #8

or a cowardly rightwinger. Think. Again. Apr 2024 #11

Yes not a coward, but complicit. Irish_Dem Apr 2024 #17

I have long suspected he is not on our side. Sky Jewels Apr 2024 #23

Definitely a coward. bamagal62 Apr 2024 #28

I guess the trial is getting boring so Nicole had to revert back to Garland bashing Fiendish Thingy Apr 2024 #4

Garland has deserved bashing from the MOMFUDSKI Apr 2024 #9

What damage? I don't see any damage Fiendish Thingy Apr 2024 #13

Letting the statute of limitations run out... Think. Again. Apr 2024 #21

major crimes - have very long limitations on time Traurigkeit Apr 2024 #24

Garland deserves to be bashed gab13by13 Apr 2024 #12

So true. Sky Jewels Apr 2024 #25

When you're a bean counter, you count beans. That's your response to anything. Girard442 Apr 2024 #6

History will not be kind to Merrick Garland. Emile Apr 2024 #7

RWingers use this as an example of why they think this is a bogus trial. progressoid Apr 2024 #10

I admit it's a null hypothesis, but I think we'd have also have been disappointed in him as an SC justice. Earth-shine Apr 2024 #16

I think there is a possibility that Garland as a SCOTUS Justice would have become the reverse image of Souter Celerity Apr 2024 #38

I don't think he wanted to be the first AG to prosecute a former President and set a precedent. jalan48 Apr 2024 #22

Why don't you ask him & let us know if you get an answer? CaptainTruth Apr 2024 #27

Maybe it would have looked, way to political for the AG ? republianmushroom Apr 2024 #29

There must be a good reason Blue Owl Apr 2024 #30

That is what the cheerleaders keep telling us. There was/is a reason. republianmushroom Apr 2024 #33

Wasn't there another AG who didn't want to prosecute the Bush crime family 3Hotdogs Apr 2024 #31

Garland undertook a bottom-up approach to the investigation BaronChocula Apr 2024 #32

I bet President Biden was thrilled with Garland gab13by13 Apr 2024 #34

My guess would be that Garland had his hands full investigating Trump for the pnwmom Apr 2024 #35

IMO, Garland is Joe Biden's biggest failure as President Goodheart Apr 2024 #37

Because Garland is a coward. n/t D23MIURG23 Apr 2024 #39