Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(5,455 posts)

2. I take it to mean

Thu Apr 25, 2024, 07:54 AM

Apr 2024

that the investigation is still on-going and the the co-conspirator might be indicted with more evidence. I'm not sure.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

7 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Can someone explain the point of an "unindicted co-conspirator" [View all] Miguelito Loveless Apr 2024 OP

Because he's above the law. The mucifer Apr 2024 #1

I take it to mean claudette Apr 2024 #2

That's one possibility; there is another. lastlib Apr 2024 #3

Yes, that's another possibility claudette Apr 2024 #4

Well, in fairness, he HAS been somewhat helpful to them.... lastlib Apr 2024 #5

There is not sufficient evidence to indict - werdna Apr 2024 #6

There are several reasons one can be an unindicted coconspirator dsc Apr 2024 #7