Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: NYT reporter says their nonstop coverage of Biden's age is retribution [View all]Farmer-Rick
(12,412 posts)34. Even when the Nazis
Break out their black boots to trample on our democracy, the filthy-rich think they will be safe. They forget about all the very rich Jewish people Hitler stole from.
Hate knows no bounds. Wealth will not keep a Nazi dictator from attacking you too. You could simply state you are against a policy and find yourself falling out of a window in Russia.
In 1930 Germany, Jewish estimated net wealth (in Reichsmarks) was 20 billion. In 1938 it was 4.5 billion. The filthy- rich are not protected by their bubble of wealth no matter how much they delude themselves. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1289274/estimates-jewish-net-wealth-nazi-germany/
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
6 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
66 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
NYT reporter says their nonstop coverage of Biden's age is retribution [View all]
bigtree
Apr 2024
OP
Let's see how the shitBird NYT responds to the revelations being out in the open.
NoMoreRepugs
Apr 2024
#1
Actually A.G. believes he's above it all, like so many of his idols. Imagine that?
Ford_Prefect
Apr 2024
#12
Because it's one of the two best newspapers (along with the WashPost) in the country.
ificandream
Apr 2024
#24
"retribution". Sounds just like trump. So glad I cancelled my subscription to The NY Times, after they accused
JohnSJ
Apr 2024
#19
Sulzberger allegedly told employees to court conservative readers, so this should come as no surprise.
JohnSJ
Apr 2024
#23
I doubt it's new - it's just that everything is so much more in the public eye now with social media, etc.
TBF
Apr 2024
#31
This "either you do a sit-down interview with us, OR we'll harp on your age, and whatever else" is coercive.
summer_in_TX
Apr 2024
#29
With the chairman's petulant attitude, it's not surprising President Biden hasn't elected to give an interview
dlk
Apr 2024
#32
I thought newspapers were in the business of reporting the news, not retribution.
surfered
Apr 2024
#39
They are all too often in the business of flattering the owner's ego - "power without responsibility"
muriel_volestrangler
Apr 2024
#48
Lapdogs Peter Baker and Jonathan Swan have rushed to Sulzberger's defense
FelineOverlord
Apr 2024
#49
The New York Times is on the same election rigging level as the National Enquirer
OnDoutside
Apr 2024
#55