Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

JohnSJ

(92,479 posts) Thu Apr 25, 2024, 11:46 AM Apr 25

14

Alito is actually suggesting that immunity makes sense to avoid retribution from political opponents in a close election [View all]

How about NO ONE IS ABOVE THE LAW.

Some of these arguments from the MALE CONSERVATIVE JUSTICES are that "grand juries", can indict anyone without necessary substance.

What are they suggesting? That the president who tried to overturn an election in front of everyone's lying eyes is without merit?

This is so depressing.

6 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Alito is actually suggesting that immunity makes sense to avoid retribution from political opponents in a close election [View all] JohnSJ Apr 25 OP

At least they are letting us know they don't believe in the law. SamKnause Apr 25 #1

Now the headline says oral arguments MOMFUDSKI Apr 25 #2

Who needs immunity when it takes 4 years to get someone in a court of law? bucolic_frolic Apr 25 #3

Some musclecar6 Apr 25 #4

So, if he's suggesting that America's legal system is corrupt, then he needs sinkingfeeling Apr 25 #5

"...retribution from political opponents in a close election" Grins Apr 25 #6

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Alito is actually suggest...