Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(1,208 posts)

6. There is not sufficient evidence to indict -

Thu Apr 25, 2024, 01:40 PM

Apr 2024

- "Five others were named as unindicted co-conspirators. The designation means these five were believed to be involved in plans to present an alternate slate of presidential electors, but were not charged with a crime for their activities."

https://www.azcentral.com/story/news/politics/elections/2024/04/25/arizona-fake-electors-unindicted-co-conspirators/73419445007/

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

7 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Can someone explain the point of an "unindicted co-conspirator" [View all] Miguelito Loveless Apr 2024 OP

Because he's above the law. The mucifer Apr 2024 #1

I take it to mean claudette Apr 2024 #2

That's one possibility; there is another. lastlib Apr 2024 #3

Yes, that's another possibility claudette Apr 2024 #4

Well, in fairness, he HAS been somewhat helpful to them.... lastlib Apr 2024 #5

There is not sufficient evidence to indict - werdna Apr 2024 #6

There are several reasons one can be an unindicted coconspirator dsc Apr 2024 #7