Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

B.See

(9,037 posts)
3. Which part of it is nonsense?
Thu Apr 25, 2024, 07:10 PM
Apr 2024

All I've said is that they are weighing whether a president has the right to kill his political opponents. An argument advanced by Trump's own lawyer which Sotomayor herself called "fundamentally evil."

And the other stories acknowledge that Trump may not gain full immunity, but that, in just hearing the case, the court has lent a certain degree of legitimacy to the notion of a president being, at least, somewhat above the law.

However, If you persist in placing faith in a court that has, to date, given VALID cause for concerns, on MANY fronts, then have at it.

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»SCOTUS: Illegitimate Arm ...»Reply #3