Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

walkingman

(11,245 posts)
3. This a good explanation from chatGPT -
Fri Apr 26, 2024, 08:15 AM
Apr 2024
Legislation: Expanding the Supreme Court would require legislation passed by both houses of Congress and signed by the President. Alternatively, a constitutional amendment could be proposed and ratified, but this is a much more difficult and lengthy process.

Proposal: A member of Congress would need to propose a bill outlining the expansion of the Supreme Court, specifying the number of additional justices to be added.

Congressional Approval: The bill would then need to pass both the House of Representatives and the Senate by a simple majority vote. This process involves committee hearings, debate, and amendments.

Presidential Approval: If the bill passes both houses of Congress, it would then be sent to the President for approval. The President can either sign the bill into law or veto it. If vetoed, Congress can attempt to override the veto with a two-thirds majority vote in both houses.

Implementation: Once signed into law, the expansion would take effect according to the timeline outlined in the legislation.

It's worth noting that expanding the Supreme Court is a highly contentious issue, and there would likely be significant debate, opposition, and potential legal challenges throughout the process. Additionally, the number of Supreme Court justices is not specified in the Constitution, so Congress has the authority to change the number through legislation. However, the size of the Court has been set at nine since 1869, so any attempt to expand it would likely face considerable political resistance and public scrutiny.

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

1. Voltaire2 Apr 2024 #1
We'll need more than that. Happy Hoosier Apr 2024 #16
I believe a simple majority can change the rules including the filibuster. bullimiami Apr 2024 #27
Exactly. lees1975 Apr 2024 #54
we need enough to be willing to end the filibuster for at least that purpose dsc Apr 2024 #2
Can't it be changed in the rules committee WhiteTara Apr 2024 #7
Whatever happens in th Rules Committee is a proposal. former9thward Apr 2024 #12
so it takes the 60 vote threshold? WhiteTara Apr 2024 #33
Under the current rules. former9thward Apr 2024 #65
Manchin and Sinema won't be there to block it. LiberalFighter Apr 2024 #53
This a good explanation from chatGPT - walkingman Apr 2024 #3
thanks....so simple majority in both houses and a presidential signature prodigitalson Apr 2024 #5
Chat apparently does not know about the Senate filibuster. former9thward Apr 2024 #10
The rules can be changed with 51 votes and the nuclear option. Nt Fiendish Thingy Apr 2024 #19
Chat did not mention that at all. former9thward Apr 2024 #23
Isn't it 50 plus tiebreaker (VP)? Polybius Apr 2024 #39
Sure, VP can be 51st vote Fiendish Thingy Apr 2024 #45
I wish we would do away with the Senate filibuster. walkingman Apr 2024 #70
Not expanding it since 1869 is a good reason to expand it along with the number of cases filed. LiberalFighter Apr 2024 #55
We'd need 51 Senators to first get rid of the filibuster. Elessar Zappa Apr 2024 #4
it's way past time to get rid of that prodigitalson Apr 2024 #6
The fact that you're angry doesn't mean that Democrats want to pack the Court brooklynite Apr 2024 #8
Mmm... maybe before yesterday. tavernier Apr 2024 #9
Absent any actual evidence, my opinion holds. brooklynite Apr 2024 #11
Expand the court prodigitalson Apr 2024 #14
Some might argue that the Court is already "packed"? kentuck Apr 2024 #21
That is absolutely the correct framing prodigitalson Apr 2024 #31
Soon, Democrats will face a critical choice Fiendish Thingy Apr 2024 #22
Name an elected official at any level who advocates expanding the number of SC Justices. brooklynite Apr 2024 #25
Here's a list of consponsors: spooky3 Apr 2024 #26
Worth pointing out... FBaggins Apr 2024 #30
People keep moving the goalposts. I'm responding spooky3 Apr 2024 #43
From the link: Polybius Apr 2024 #52
Elizabeth Warren, Ed Markey, Tina Smith Fiendish Thingy Apr 2024 #29
The fact that you're not angry doesn't mean that Republicans did not pack the Court. speak easy Apr 2024 #47
Is it really packing if the court becomes more balanced? LiberalFighter Apr 2024 #56
I hope they are paying attention and CHANGE THEIR MINDS Iwasthere Apr 2024 #68
Real Dems or DINOs like Maserati Manchin and Curtsy Kyrsten... JT45242 Apr 2024 #13
This prodigitalson Apr 2024 #15
Simple majority if 51 support killing the filibuster. Nt Fiendish Thingy Apr 2024 #17
You need the will to attempt it TexasDem69 Apr 2024 #18
We need 20 years of a democratic Senate Johonny Apr 2024 #20
Nobody in power wants that. The sc is a much honored and beloved institution Autumn Apr 2024 #24
Also better to let them take the blame leftstreet Apr 2024 #32
Not true. spooky3 Apr 2024 #34
Won't happen. Republicans will pack the courts to legislate what they want. Autumn Apr 2024 #35
Maybe; depends on election results. But it's not true that "nobody in power spooky3 Apr 2024 #42
Joe doesn't support expanding the court. He's said that. So some Dems might like the idea Autumn Apr 2024 #44
One last time--you made a claim that "nobody wants this." That's not spooky3 Apr 2024 #49
Who has the power to bring this bill up and pass it? Autumn Apr 2024 #64
He may be more inclined to support an expansion now. LiberalFighter Apr 2024 #59
It has happened in the past. We have not always had 9 justices. wnylib Apr 2024 #38
The court changed six times before settling at the present total of nine in 1869. Autumn Apr 2024 #41
And it can change again. wnylib Apr 2024 #46
Good luck with that, FDR couldn't do it in war time. nt Autumn Apr 2024 #48
One Goodheart Apr 2024 #28
Expanding the court would be a terrible thing for Democrats to do. We would lose future elections for decades! beaglelover Apr 2024 #36
No we wouldn't. That is just hyperbole. LiberalFighter Apr 2024 #60
Depends on multiple things Polybius Apr 2024 #37
How about just one Justice? Polybius Apr 2024 #40
President Biden has said he doesn't support expanding SCOTUS ripcord Apr 2024 #50
No it doesn't. He probably thought it was pointless when he didn't have the votes to make it happen. LiberalFighter Apr 2024 #61
You are projecting your emotions onto him ripcord Apr 2024 #63
Wouldn't you be projecting? LiberalFighter Apr 2024 #66
I have no problem trusting the President to do what he thinks is right ripcord Apr 2024 #67
But you are saying he won't change his mind. LiberalFighter Apr 2024 #69
Enough to make Mitch McConnell and Fox News irrelevant. Initech Apr 2024 #51
Bad idea CelticCrow Apr 2024 #57
Expanding the SCOTUS is a nice thought but in reality, I can never see that happening. elocs Apr 2024 #58
Another issue that needs to be dealt with is the judge shopping. LiberalFighter Apr 2024 #62
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»How big of a Senate major...»Reply #3