Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

FarPoint

(12,628 posts) Sat Apr 27, 2024, 11:37 AM Apr 27

Another thought....Did tRumps attorney Sauers meet with any SC Justices before the hearing? [View all]

I just felt that maybe Sauers already knew the questions like from Alito....not sure about the other repug justices ....maybe the tRump appoitment ones too???? Likr they already had their mind made up...

Now...is that private meeting permitted???? I don't know....

If it is not permitted...oh myyyyy....

14 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Another thought....Did tRumps attorney Sauers meet with any SC Justices before the hearing? [View all] FarPoint Apr 27 OP

Nothing is beyond them. They are on a MOMFUDSKI Apr 27 #1

Any support for that accusation? TexasDem69 Apr 27 #2

it was a question, not a accusation, duh Shellback Squid Apr 27 #5

Would it matter? Would it be unethical by the courts own standards? getagrip_already Apr 27 #6

Just my observation during the arguments... FarPoint Apr 27 #7

Understood TexasDem69 Apr 27 #9

I've worked on a few SCOTUS arguments and well prepped counsel rarely are surprised by the questions they get onenote Apr 27 #11

Ohhhh Thank You.... FarPoint Apr 27 #12

Wouldn't be surprised moondust Apr 27 #3

They could have met on Fifth Avenue. It doesn't matter. Their attitude is "So What?" dalton99a Apr 27 #4

They aren't listening to make a ruling Marthe48 Apr 27 #8

I can see it DoBW Apr 27 #10

Absent ANY evidence that it happened, there's no point evaluating the significance of it happening. brooklynite Apr 27 #13

One can process a concern... FarPoint Apr 27 #14